[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [lojban] Re: A comment on one of my jboselkei translations
- To: lojban-list@lojban.org
- Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: A comment on one of my jboselkei translations
- From: John E Clifford <clifford-j@sbcglobal.net>
- Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2006 08:51:38 -0800 (PST)
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=sbcglobal.net; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=ipD18lNYc4xwl5TFeqbcx3/OMA1OiSy2iJtfdw7uSg5xXRznUbx4mn1c90KJW+j4qbZKz08UnA6I+nFwUjKpay2u/71sGm7/oVAJPMzVQLYnlLKCSlpeaojZ+xclbkYJovYt0JujBnHs9R1CWfNTMkQ5tA+2Fuck9GbBwy3Lg6w= ;
- In-reply-to: <e6663d200603220827m75f97704s14f409c11af07800@mail.gmail.com>
- Sender: nobody <nobody@digitalkingdom.org>
Isn't that the definition of malglico?
--- Matt Arnold <matt.mattarn@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 3/22/06, Pierre Abbat <phma@phma.optus.nu>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > > I also didn't think that a past tense tag
> was necessary because of the
> > {ca
> > > le cabycerni} tense sumti. Am I wrong?
> >
> > It isn't necessary. It isn't necessary even
> without it; tense is optional
> > in
> > Lojban.
> >
>
> Tense is optional in texts written originally
> in Lojban, but the English to
> be translated was asking for it.
> -epkat
>