On 5/4/06, Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/4/06, Maxim Katcharov <maxim.katcharov@gmail.com> wrote: > What does it mean to have the > bear "in mind"? Is it opposed to, say, "any bear", or "bears in > general", or "bearness", or "all bears typically"? Yes. (Except for "bearness", because lo cribe has to be something that does cribe, and bearness doesn't.)
[...]
> I would like to have what "in mind" means explained.
I think {le} indeed serves to preclude the "any" or "in general"
interpretation that {lo} does not preclude.
So... is it then impossible to use {lo'e} in conjunction with "le"? If
it is possible, then what do you mean by {le} serving to preclude the
"any" or "in general" interpretations?