On 5/4/06, Maxim Katcharov <maxim.katcharov@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/4/06, Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think {le} indeed serves to preclude the "any" or "in general"
> interpretation that {lo} does not preclude.
So... is it then impossible to use {lo'e} in conjunction with "le"? If
it is possible, then what do you mean by {le} serving to preclude the
"any" or "in general" interpretations?
I will pass on {lo'e} since I don't really know how it works, nor do
I have a theory on how it should work.
All I meant is that {le cribe cu nelci le jbari} cannot mean "bears
like berries", it can only be a statement about some particular bear
or group of bears and some particular berry or bunch of berries, not
about bears and berriies in general.
mu'o mi'e xorxes