Re: [lojban] re prenu

[John E Clifford <clifford-j@sbcglobal.net>]

At least officially, {re prenu} is equivalent to
{re lo prenu} and {lo} is used for distrbutive
predication.  That is, each carries it
separately. I think that that would be the answer
on any of the suggested changes in these
expressions, if for no other reason than that
{re} distributes even the most collectivized
sumti, taking them separately.

--- Yanis Batura <ybatura@mail.ru> wrote:

> And another question.
> 
> {re prenu cu bevri lo pipno}
> 
> Are these {re prenu} carrying the piano
> together (as in {loi} or when using {joi}), or
> this statement is true for both persons
separately?