Re: [lojban] Re: Usage of lo and le

To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: Usage of lo and le
From: HeliodoR <exitconsole@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 16:24:35 +0200
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=XkHj0DpZ8ndjt0n3h9ENTL+EbSKscz7ceoJXMjquqC8hiuSTNv+N/M1n2vWhVVsqypmce0xg+P3PFs5rjF4j5+t/iP2JHLmrditztb4MwJfSARHk5eY3AlOGk0kLbS2fYSZW3Utvwgnk3bPi/kn0N2WWGrlDy8PGLYfmylmzhk4=
In-reply-to: <ec8285e60605111959h151a36f7l5ea44422f217be91@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4463F513.7060207@ropine.com> <ec8285e60605111959h151a36f7l5ea44422f217be91@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: nobody <nobody@digitalkingdom.org>

My suggestion is that {lo cribe cu morsi} mean exactly that (blank
inner quantifier).

Why not {ro le cribe cu morsi}, all of *those* bears are dead?

mi'e darves.

References:
- Re: Usage of lo and le
  - From: Seth Gordon <sethg@ropine.com>
- Re: [lojban] Re: Usage of lo and le
  - From: "Maxim Katcharov" <maxim.katcharov@gmail.com>