On Jun 21, 2006, at 11:46 AM, John E Clifford wrote:
For most of its history, Loglan/Lojban's claim of unambiguity was cashed out as claims that 1) the speech stream was uniquely decomposed into words, 2) the word string was uniquely parsed and 3)nowords are polysemous. [ li'osai ]
Claims 1 and 2 are especially helpful to me as shown in jbofi'e. Lojban is the only language where I know I can automatically generate a gloss of any grammatical discourse and actually pick it apart with my rather basic level of understanding. This is extremely helpful as I'm learning the language, since I can do hypotheticals like "how does it parse if I take out the {bo}?".
For comparison, Google's Language Tools is close for natural languages, but it has trouble with complex expressions (surprise!).
mu'omi'e .aleks.