[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [lojban] Alphabet proposal one.
- To: lojban-list@lojban.org
- Subject: Re: [lojban] Alphabet proposal one.
- From: "Jorge Llambías" <jjllambias@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 20:51:09 -0300
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Zm6N1ZGpWqbjttVGWAdu4gbyWlVLiDh1oRGbCiRa3Mw8DeFgIGdI8Iu7g7Z1KrchCPUaz6JO5b4ShSFIQc+YGgv05PXGAxJEzqtmwiyVrYI07BYtgyb9VV3w8DgV3d0eZowRMGS9ufcmSFfHmVsdFpIcVBQtcBUXz4ioNfrF6sk=
- In-reply-to: <44AD673B.7060501@gmail.com>
- References: <44AD673B.7060501@gmail.com>
- Sender: nobody <nobody@digitalkingdom.org>
On 7/6/06, Hugh O'Byrne <hobyrne@gmail.com> wrote:
I propose that the LLG give that community an official recommendation.
The LLG has deferred matters concerning language design to the BPFK,
which is already some three years late and counting in the fullfillment of
its mission, so don't hold your breath for an official answer.
As a personal, unofficial recommendation I would say use whichever
alphabet you prefer. If your goal is to have as many people as
possible read your Lojban, I recommend you use the Latin alphabet.
If your goal is to promote the use of some other alphabet, then I
recommend you use that other one.
If the CLL or the BPFK ever come to treat the question, my vote will
be for it not to declare any alphabet official, since I don't really see
the point of having an official alphabet.
mu'o mi'e xorxes