[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lojban] Re: Alphabet proposal one.

To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: Alphabet proposal one.
From: Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>
Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 16:54:33 -0700
In-reply-to: <925d17560607061651p19623e56x7c188368533f9c48@mail.gmail.com>
Mail-followup-to: lojban-list@lojban.org
References: <44AD673B.7060501@gmail.com> <925d17560607061651p19623e56x7c188368533f9c48@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: nobody <nobody@digitalkingdom.org>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.11+cvs20060403

On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 08:51:09PM -0300, Jorge Llamb?as wrote:
> If the CLL or the BPFK ever come to treat the question, my vote
> will be for it not to declare any alphabet official, since I don't
> really see the point of having an official alphabet.

That would be my inclination as well.

-Robin

-- 
http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** http://www.lojban.org/
Reason #237 To Learn Lojban: "Homonyms: Their Grate!"
Proud Supporter of the Singularity Institute - http://singinst.org/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [lojban] Re: Alphabet proposal one.
  - From: "Theodore Reed" <ted.reed@gmail.com>

References:
- Alphabet proposal one.
  - From: Hugh O'Byrne <hobyrne@gmail.com>
- Re: [lojban] Alphabet proposal one.
  - From: "Jorge Llambías" <jjllambias@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [lojban] Alphabet proposal one.
Next by Date: Re: [lojban] Re: Alphabet proposal one.
Previous by thread: Re: [lojban] Alphabet proposal one.
Next by thread: Re: [lojban] Re: Alphabet proposal one.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread