On 08.07.2006, 22:53, Jorge Llambнas wrote:
> On 7/8/06, Alex Martini <alexjm@umich.edu> wrote:
>> On Jul 8, 2006, at 10:35 AM, Yanis Batura wrote:
>> > [ li'o ] .i le jbixa'u cu cinba le fetspe be vo'a ca ro nu vo'a
>> > xruti le zdani
>> Should this be {le fetspe pe vo'a}? Jbovlaste gives the x2 as
>> 'speni3', which is law/custom/tradition/system/convention.
> Nah, that's clearly a bad definition. There doesn't seem to be
> any reason to drop the x2 of {speni} in {fetspe}. If one did
> drop it, it would seem that the meaning of the lujvo would have
> to be {speni be lo fetsi} instead of {fetsi je speni}.
I have added the correct definition for fetspe, see jbovlaste again:
http://jbovlaste.lojban.org/dict/fetspe
mi'e .ianis.
---------------------
Lojban: A Language With *Intelligent* Design