Re: [lojban] Re: [Anecdote #8] prami jbixa'u

[Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>]

On Sat, Jul 08, 2006 at 11:19:10PM +0700, Yanis Batura wrote:
> On 08.07.2006, 22:53, Jorge Llamb?as wrote:
> 
> > On 7/8/06, Alex Martini <alexjm@umich.edu> wrote:
> 
> >> On Jul 8, 2006, at 10:35 AM, Yanis Batura wrote:
> 
> >> > [ li'o ] .i le jbixa'u cu cinba le fetspe be vo'a ca ro nu
> >> > vo'a xruti le zdani
> 
> >> Should this be {le fetspe pe vo'a}? Jbovlaste gives the x2 as
> >> 'speni3', which is law/custom/tradition/system/convention.
> 
> > Nah, that's clearly a bad definition. There doesn't seem to be
> > any reason to drop the x2 of {speni} in {fetspe}. If one did
> > drop it, it would seem that the meaning of the lujvo would have
> > to be {speni be lo fetsi} instead of {fetsi je speni}.
> 
> I have added the correct definition for fetspe, see jbovlaste
> again: http://jbovlaste.lojban.org/dict/fetspe

Erm.  Ignore my belated comment, then.  Sorry.

-Robin

-- 
http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** http://www.lojban.org/
Reason #237 To Learn Lojban: "Homonyms: Their Grate!"
Proud Supporter of the Singularity Institute - http://singinst.org/