On 09.07.2006, 0:00, HeliodoR wrote:
> Oh God in Heaven (in case You exist), jbofi'e cannot parse {lo be lo [selbri1] ku [selbri2]}!
> It recognizes {lo [selbri2] be lo [selbri1]} only.
> I that a glitch? Or do I not know something about the grammar of {be} I should?
>
> Otherwise it's completely grammatical. I only missed one {be'o}. :)
> Correction: {i lo mamta be lo rirni be mi be'o be'o li'o}.
I read the CLL 5:7 about {be} attachments. It wasn't mentioned there that we can pull {be} in front of the selbri. I am not an expert in formal grammars, but there we can find an answer to this point.
Jorge, what will you say?
mi'e .ianis.
---------------------
Lojban: A Language With *Intelligent* Design