Re: [lojban] Re: Lojban and Women

To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: Lojban and Women
From: HeliodoR <exitconsole@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 22:17:56 +0200
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=bafNeSai/2WQRBzL5LNunShaCmI7XJ/XIvKbIiTBw0SN96m/jhj1Q3fAy/DCr2JSIN4UpQ8EVbHmLLGn568dglz62G2v2KlIdOJeBA0t2Hfdq0/pk/ZQdnrFJNLZAI2AfwOfg35e3KJBV1o0WRJdKh4tYxmvihF2v3AobpkldYw=
In-reply-to: <12d58c160608091302w2bf9a797k10dd74be78376c4f@mail.gmail.com>
References: <E1GAiAB-0007VW-00.ybatura-mail-ru@f13.mail.ru> <12d58c160608091302w2bf9a797k10dd74be78376c4f@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: nobody <nobody@digitalkingdom.org>

Isn't the number of female Lojbanists so small that such an article would be premature?

IMO the topic would be Lojban's relation to gender-based

discrimination, which it usually tries to avoid.

But maybe I'm wrong.

References:
- Lojban and Women
  - From: Yanis Batura <ybatura@mail.ru>
- Re: [lojban] Lojban and Women
  - From: "komfo,amonan" <komfoamonan@gmail.com>