Re: [lojban] Re: catni - 4

[HeliodoR <exitconsole@gmail.com>]

> > "mi na tolcertu la lojban."

> It is also perfectly correct to say {tolcertu be la lojban}.
> Semantically, in a construction like that, there's no difference between
> the forms.  The {be} binds the second sumti more tightly to the selbri,
> making it actually part of the selbri, but since there's nothing after
> it, the changed precedences don't matter.

 

You're right, sorry about that one.

 

> > "lo nu do [...]"

 

> Good is the fact, not the event.

 

I don't see the reason why.

"It's good that You can translate almost anything." (nu/za'i)

"The statement that You can translate almost anything is good." (du'u)

Isn't the first one what You meant?

> > "ni'i lo nu go'i [...]"

 

> {lo go'i} = {lo du'u do ka'e fanva so'a da la lojban [kei]}.

 

Totally right. I dunno how I didn't see that. o'anai