On 13.08.2006, 8:19, Matt Arnold wrote:
> On 8/11/06, Yanis Batura <ybatura@mail.ru> wrote:
>> The second means not fog itself, but the liquid, of which fog is composed.
>> Wouldn't it be better that {bumru} had another definition:
>> "x1 is fog covering consisting of x2 and covering x3"
>> Please don't kill me! ;)
> "Liquid of which fog is composed" _is_ the fog itself. It cannot _not_
> be fog. {tu se bumru} is precisely what is meant.
> -epkat
I thought x2 of bumru was intended to specify the type of the fog, since there can be many different.
mi'e .ianis.