So I think it would really only make things difficult for a person with a speech impediment that *prevents* them from pausing at certain points.
Correct me if I'm wrong here, please. On Nov 9, 2006, at 12:00 AM, Timothy Hobbs wrote:
Robin. just a note. though mandatory pauses do not cause problems, I do not think... rules based on pauses are bad. about 1.5% of people, stutter. you would not want to make them unable to speak due to the inability to not pause :)To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list- request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or ifyou're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.