[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lojban] Re: Military language



On 1/3/07, Seth Gordon <sethg@ropine.com> wrote:
M@ wrote:

> Of course, there can still be misunderstandings, if there is
> interference and the word 'na' doesn't come through out of "ko na daspo
> le ckule" bad things would probably happen.

Isn't there a standard to always use "NOT REPEAT NOT" in military
telegrams to make sure the reader doesn't skip over the word?

Hmm...

I wonder whether the two {na}'s in {ko na ke'u na daspo le ckule}
would cancel out? What would a robot bomber do?

mu'o mi'e xorxes