[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Military language



Seth Gordon wrote:
> Isn't there a standard to always use "NOT REPEAT NOT" in military
> telegrams to make sure the reader doesn't skip over the word?

another thought that just came to my mind is that lojban allows the
vowels to be spoken as long as the user desires to, so maybe i'd just
say "naaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa" instead of "na" :)

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature