[lojban] Re: Fw: bridi tail negation

[Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>]

On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 11:53 AM, Michael Turniansky
<mturniansky@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 9:39 AM, A. PIEKARSKI <totus@rogers.com> wrote:
>
>>  {.i na'e se zanfri fa lonu zutse ne'i le ricyzda gi'e na tavla}?
>>
>> Would the negation have covered the whole bridi or just the bridi tail?
>
>  My belief is that it would also just negate the tail.  More
> problematic to me is a na in front of the first selbri.   The CLL
> doesn't unfortunately cover these cases.

It is clear from the formal grammar that the parsing is:

   (na tavla) gi'e (zutse ne'i le ricyzda)

i.e. the same as for:

   ge (na tavla) gi (zutse ne'i le ricyzda)

mu'o mi'e xorxes


To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org
with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if
you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.