Mail Thread Index

Date Index

[Prev Page][Next Page]

semisummary: countability, And Rosta
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: semisummary: countability, JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS
- Re: semisummary: countability, Logical Language Group
- Re: semisummary: countability, And Rosta
- Re: semisummary: countability, And Rosta
- Re: semisummary: countability, JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS
- Re: semisummary: countability, Logical Language Group
- Re: semisummary: countability, And Rosta
- Re: semisummary: countability, And Rosta
- Re: semisummary: countability, JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS
- Re: semisummary: countability, Logical Language Group
- Re: semisummary: countability, And Rosta
psychotherapeutic lojban, And Rosta
- Re: psychotherapeutic lojban, John Cowan
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: psychotherapeutic lojban, Lee Daniel Crocker (none)
- Re: psychotherapeutic lojban, John Cowan
partial instantiations (was: Re: GLI Re: do all nu's happen?), And Rosta
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: partial instantiations (was: Re: GLI Re: do all nu's happen?), JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS
  - CAha (was: partial instantiations), John Cowan
- Re: partial instantiations (was: Re: GLI Re: do all nu's happen?), Logical Language Group
truthvalues (was Re: ni, jei, perfectionism), And Rosta
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: truthvalues (was Re: ni, jei, perfectionism), bob
- Re: truthvalues (was Re: ni, jei, perfectionism), And Rosta
- Re: truthvalues (was Re: ni, jei, perfectionism), bob
more on nu (was Re: reply to And #1), And Rosta
Re: splitting list, Lee Daniel Crocker (none)
From the cheering section ;-), Rick Nylander
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: From the cheering section ;-), Logical Language Group
Carl Burke's question, Logical Language Group
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Carl Burke's question, Carl Burke
- Re: Carl Burke's question, JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS
- Re: Carl Burke's question, Carl Burke
- Re: Carl Burke's question, JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS
- Re: Carl Burke's question, Carl Burke
- Re: Carl Burke's question, Chris Bogart
- Re: Carl Burke's question, JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS
kennings - reprint of Jl10 articles on Lojban poetry, Logical Language Group
Some reduced price copies of the Lojban refgram available, Logical Language Group
ca'a/pu'i, JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: ca'a/pu'i, Logical Language Group
- Re: ca'a/pu'i, JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS
ba'e, JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS
- <Possible follow-ups>
- ba'e, Daniel Adamec
  - Re: [lojban] ba'e, Robin Lee Powell
Re: kennings, Chris Bogart
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: kennings, Robin Turner
- Re: kennings, Chris Bogart
- Re: kennings, Thanatos
- Re: kennings, Logical Language Group
  - [lojban] Re: kennings, zacch . edgmon
Re: UNESCO RED BOOK ON ENDANGERED LANGUAGES: EUROPE, Tapani Salminen
Problem fixed (maybe), Logical Language Group
cold logic (was "re:kennings"), Robin Turner
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: cold logic (was "re:kennings"), Chris Bogart
Beginner question on meaning of "le ... xu ku" and "le ... ku xu", Thanatos
Re: partial instantiations (was: Re: GLI Re: do all nu's ha, And Rosta
beginner's question, Robin Turner
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: beginner's question, JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS
- Re: beginner's question, Chris Bogart
- Re: beginner's question, Logical Language Group
flowers (was: "beginner's question"), Robin Turner
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: flowers (was: "beginner's question"), JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS
ba'e (was: kau), John Cowan
CAha (was: partial instantiations), John Cowan
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: CAha (was: partial instantiations), And Rosta
  - Re: CAha (was: partial instantiations), John Cowan
- Re: CAha (was: partial instantiations), John Cowan
Re: cold logic, Robin Turner
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: cold logic, bob
Re: Beginner question on meaning of "le ... xu ku" and "le ... ku xu", Chris Bogart
Re: flowers (was "re: beginner's question"), Logical Language Group
whether (was Re: ni, jei, perfectionism), And Rosta
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: whether (was Re: ni, jei, perfectionism), Logical Language Group
- Re: whether (was Re: ni, jei, perfectionism), And Rosta
- Re: whether (was Re: ni, jei, perfectionism), JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS
  - Re: whether (was Re: ni, jei, perfectionism), John Cowan
- Re: whether (was Re: ni, jei, perfectionism), John Cowan
- Re: whether (was Re: ni, jei, perfectionism), And Rosta
- Re: whether (was Re: ni, jei, perfectionism), Chris Bogart
- Re: whether (was Re: ni, jei, perfectionism), Logical Language Group
- Re: whether (was Re: ni, jei, perfectionism), JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS
- Re: whether (was Re: ni, jei, perfectionism), Logical Language Group
- Re: whether (was Re: ni, jei, perfectionism), And Rosta
  - Re: whether (was Re: ni, jei, perfectionism), John Cowan
- Re: whether (was Re: ni, jei, perfectionism), And Rosta
- Re: whether (was Re: ni, jei, perfectionism), And Rosta
- Re: whether (was Re: ni, jei, perfectionism), John Cowan
- Re: whether (was Re: ni, jei, perfectionism), Carl Burke
- Re: whether (was Re: ni, jei, perfectionism), John Cowan
- Re: whether (was Re: ni, jei, perfectionism), John Cowan
- Re: whether (was Re: ni, jei, perfectionism), JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS
- Re: whether (was Re: ni, jei, perfectionism), JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS
- Re: whether (was Re: ni, jei, perfectionism), Logical Language Group
  - Re: whether (was Re: ni, jei, perfectionism), John Cowan
- Re: whether (was Re: ni, jei, perfectionism), And Rosta
- Re: whether (was Re: ni, jei, perfectionism), And Rosta
- Re: whether (was Re: ni, jei, perfectionism), And Rosta
- Re: whether (was Re: ni, jei, perfectionism), Carl Burke
- Re: whether (was Re: ni, jei, perfectionism), Logical Language Group
- Re: whether (was Re: ni, jei, perfectionism), And Rosta

Mail converted by MHonArc