Mail Index

• Thread Index

• Re: tech: logic matters
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: CONLANG: How many planned languages have there been?
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: tech: logic matters
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: TECH: fuzzy logic proposals
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: TECH: fuzzy logic proposals
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: tech: logic matters
  • From: David Barton <dlb@SEVERN.WASH.INMET.COM>
• Re: tech: logic matters
  • From: David Barton <dlb@SEVERN.WASH.INMET.COM>
• Re: lojban evolution
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Re: brain fart metaphor
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Re: PLI: "except"
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Re: loglan rapprochement orthography
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Re: PLI: "except"
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Re: lojban evolution
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Re: brain fart metaphor
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Re: loglan rapprochement orthography
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Re: tech: logic matters
  • From: Jim Carter <jimc@MATH.UCLA.EDU>
• Re: lojban evolution
  • From: Jim Carter <jimc@MATH.UCLA.EDU>
• Re: tech: logic matters
  • From: Jim Carter <jimc@MATH.UCLA.EDU>
• Re: lojban evolution
  • From: Jim Carter <jimc@MATH.UCLA.EDU>
• Re: TECH: fuzzy logic
  • From: Gerald Koenig <jlk@NETCOM.COM>
• Re: TECH: fuzzy logic
  • From: Gerald Koenig <jlk@NETCOM.COM>
• Re: tech: logic matters (CLD)
  • From: Gerald Koenig <jlk@NETCOM.COM>
• [no subject]
  • From: "Steven M. Belknap" <sbelknap@UIC.EDU>
• Re: tech: logic matters (CLD)
  • From: Gerald Koenig <jlk@NETCOM.COM>
• Re: SNU: ko co'e bau la lojban. (PU: cld (Jorge returns))
  • From: Chris Bogart <cbogart@QUETZAL.COM>
• Re: SNU: ko co'e bau la lojban. (PU: cld (Jorge returns))
  • From: Chris Bogart <cbogart@QUETZAL.COM>
• Re: PLI: "except"
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: lojban evolution
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: brain fart metaphor
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: loglan rapprochement orthography
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: lojban evolution
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: TECH: fuzzy logic
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• you seem to not have subject lines in your posts
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: PLI: "except"
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: lojban evolution
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: brain fart metaphor
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: lojban evolution
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: loglan rapprochement orthography
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: loglan rapprochement orthography
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@LOCKE.CCIL.ORG>
• Re: TECH: fuzzy logic
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• you seem to not have subject lines in your posts
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: loglan rapprochement orthography
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
• Re: loglan rapprochement orthography
  • From: cowan
• Some but not all (was: "except")
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@LOCKE.CCIL.ORG>
• Re: TECH: fuzzy logic proposals
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@LOCKE.CCIL.ORG>
• Some but not all (was: "except")
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
• Some but not all (was: "except")
  • From: cowan
• Re: TECH: fuzzy logic proposals
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
• Re: TECH: fuzzy logic proposals
  • From: cowan
• Re: existing ways to fuzz?
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• lo la trabant karce
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• tech: logic matters
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Re: TECH: fuzzy logic proposals (NEW CMAVO)
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Re: pe'a & tanru
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Re: existing ways to fuzz?
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Re: pe'a & tanru
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• tech: logic matters
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Re: PLI: cau et al. (PU: Re: cld)
  • From: Goran Topic <topic@STUDENT.MATH.HR>
• Re: PLI: "except"
  • From: Goran Topic <topic@STUDENT.MATH.HR>
• Re: PLI: cau et al. (PU: Re: cld)
  • From: Goran Topic <topic@STUDENT.MATH.HR>
• Re: PLI: "except"
  • From: Goran Topic <topic@STUDENT.MATH.HR>
• Re: TECH: fuzzy logic proposals (NEW CMAVO)
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: existing ways to fuzz?
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: TECH: fuzzy logic proposals (NEW CMAVO)
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: tech: logic matters
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: brain fart metaphor
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• steven on john's fuzz moot
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Re: PLI: "except"
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Re: loglan rapprochement orthography
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Re: lojban evolution
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Re: existing ways to fuzz?
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: tech: logic matters
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: brain fart metaphor
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• steven on john's fuzz moot
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Re: brain fart metaphor
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: PLI: "except"
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Re: loglan rapprochement orthography
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Re: lojban evolution
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Re: steven on john's fuzz moot
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: brain fart metaphor
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: loglan rapprochement orthography
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: lojban evolution
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• *old response to and #2
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• *old response to And on fuzzy proposals
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• *old response to and #1
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• *old response to Steven B #2
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• *old response to Steven B #3
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• *old response to Steven B #4
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• *old response onbuffer vowel
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• *old response to djer.
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• *old response to Steven B on clani
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: steven on john's fuzz moot
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• *old response to Jorge
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• *old response on "moskvas"
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• *old response on xorvo
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• *old response to paulo
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• *old response on lambda issues
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• *old response to Cyril on "hearsay"
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• *old response to Bob C. on e'a
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• *old response on gismu baseline
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>