Mail Index

• Thread Index

• Lojban
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab>
• Re: your posting and Holmes' reply
  • From: veion@xiron.pc.helsinki.fi
• Re: some definitions
  • From: i.alexander.bra0125@oasis.icl.co.uk
• Re: context in Lojban
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Re: singular and plural
  • From: jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU
• Re: context in Lojban
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@ucl.ac.uk>
• Re: singular and plural
  • From: jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU
• Re: context in Lojban
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab>
• Re: context in Lojban
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: veridicality
  • From: "Robert J. Chassell" <bob@GNU.AI.MIT.EDU>
• Re: veridicality
  • From: "Robert J. Chassell" <bob@GNU.AI.MIT.EDU>
• Re: context in Lojban
  • From: jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU
• Re: veridicality
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Cowan weighs in #1: specific, definite
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab>
• Cowan weighs in #2: needing a box
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab>
• Cowan weighs in #3: John and James love Steve or Mary
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab>
• Cowan weighs in #4: embedded imperatives
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab>
• Cowan weighs in #5: tenses
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab>
• Cowan weighs in #2: needing a box
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Cowan weighs in #3: John and James love Steve or Mary
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Cowan weighs in #4: embedded imperatives
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Cowan weighs in #5: tenses
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: context in Lojban
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Cowan weighs in #1: specific, definite
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• lo, transparency
  • From: Gerald Koenig <jlk@NETCOM.COM>
• Re: Cowan weighs in #1: specific, definite
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Re: veridicality
  • From: jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU
• Re: preti zo goi .e zo nai
  • From: Goran Topic <topic@MATH.HR>
• Re: Cowan weighs in #1: specific, definite
  • From: jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU
• Re: Cowan weighs in #4: embedded imperatives
  • From: jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU
• Re: veridicality
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@ucl.ac.uk>
• Re: context in Lojban
  • From: jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU
• Re: context in Lojban
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@ucl.ac.uk>
• lo, transparency
  • From: Gerald Koenig <jlk@NETCOM.COM>
• Re: Cowan weighs in #1: specific, definite
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@ucl.ac.uk>
• Re: veridicality
  • From: jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU
• Re: Cowan weighs in #1: specific, definite
  • From: jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU
• Re: Cowan weighs in #4: embedded imperatives
  • From: jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU
• Re: preti zo goi .e zo nai
  • From: Goran Topic <topic@math.hr>
• Re: context in Lojban
  • From: "Robert J. Chassell" <bob@GNU.AI.MIT.EDU>
• veridicality trivial?
  • From: "Robert J. Chassell" <bob@GNU.AI.MIT.EDU>
• Lojban equivalent of "which?".
  • From: "Robert J. Chassell" <bob@GNU.AI.MIT.EDU>
• Re: preti zo goi .e zo nai
  • From: jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU
• Re: context in Lojban
  • From: "Robert J. Chassell" <bob@GNU.AI.MIT.EDU>
• veridicality trivial?
  • From: "Robert J. Chassell" <bob@GNU.AI.MIT.EDU>
• Re: context in Lojban
  • From: jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU
• Lojban equivalent of "which?".
  • From: "Robert J. Chassell" <bob@GNU.AI.MIT.EDU>
• Re: veridicality trivial?
  • From: jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU
• Re: Lojban equivalent of "which?".
  • From: jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU
• Re: context in Lojban
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Re: veridicality trivial?
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Re: context in Lojban
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Re: context in Lojban
  • From: jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU
• Re: preti zo goi .e zo nai
  • From: jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU
• Re: context in Lojban
  • From: jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU
• Re: veridicality trivial?
  • From: jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU
• Re: Lojban equivalent of "which?".
  • From: jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU
• Re: context in Lojban
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@ucl.ac.uk>
• Re: veridicality trivial?
  • From: DLS9@AOL.COM
• Re: veridicality trivial?
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@ucl.ac.uk>
• Re: context in Lojban
  • From: "Robert J. Chassell" <bob@GNU.AI.MIT.EDU>
• Re: lo, transparency
  • From: jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU
• Re: context in Lojban
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@ucl.ac.uk>
• Re: context in Lojban
  • From: jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU
• Re: context in Lojban
  • From: jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU
• Re: veridicality trivial?
  • From: DLS9@aol.com
• Re: context in Lojban
  • From: "Robert J. Chassell" <bob@GNU.AI.MIT.EDU>
• Re: lo, transparency
  • From: jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU
• Re: context in Lojban
  • From: jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU
• -veridical, -specific
  • From: Goran Topic <topic@MATH.HR>
• -veridical, -specific
  • From: Goran Topic <topic@math.hr>
• Re: context in Lojban
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Re: context in Lojban
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Re: context in Lojban
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@ucl.ac.uk>
• Re: context in Lojban
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@ucl.ac.uk>
• Re: -veridical, -specific
  • From: jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU
• Re: context in Lojban
  • From: jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU
• Re: -veridical, -specific
  • From: jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU
• Re: context in Lojban
  • From: jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU
• Re: Cowan weighs in #4: embedded imperatives
  • From: Chris Bogart <cbogart@QUETZAL.COM>
• Re: context in Lojban
  • From: Chris Bogart <cbogart@QUETZAL.COM>
• any
  • From: "John E. Clifford" <pcliffje@CRL.COM>
• Re: veridicality trivial?
  • From: Nick Legend Nicholas <nsn@SPEECH.LANGUAGE.UNIMELB.EDU.AU>
• lo
  • From: "John E. Clifford" <pcliffje@CRL.COM>
• Re: Cowan weighs in #4: embedded imperatives
  • From: Chris Bogart <cbogart@quetzal.com>
• Re: context in Lojban
  • From: Chris Bogart <cbogart@quetzal.com>
• any
  • From: "John E. Clifford" <pcliffje@CRL.COM>
• Re: veridicality trivial?
  • From: Nick Legend Nicholas <nsn@SPEECH.LANGUAGE.UNIMELB.EDU.AU>
• lo
  • From: "John E. Clifford" <pcliffje@CRL.COM>
• {lo} excellent as is
  • From: bob@GNU.AI.MIT.EDU
• Re: any
  • From: jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU
• Re: any
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Re: lo
  • From: jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU
• {lo} excellent as is
  • From: bob@GNU.AI.MIT.EDU
• lo & quantifiers
  • From: Gerald Koenig <jlk@NETCOM.COM>
• Re: {lo} excellent as is
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Re: lo
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• lo
  • From: Gerald Koenig <jlk@NETCOM.COM>
• logic for language
  • From: DonSimpson@aol.com
• Re: lo
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab>