Mail Index
[First Page][Prev Page][Next Page][Last Page]
- logic for language (fwd)
- From: Logical Language Group <lojbab>
- logic for language (fwd)
- From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
- Re: lo
- From: jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU
- Re: any
- From: ucleaar <ucleaar@ucl.ac.uk>
- lo & quantifiers
- From: Gerald Koenig <jlk@NETCOM.COM>
- Re: {lo} excellent as is
- From: ucleaar <ucleaar@ucl.ac.uk>
- Re: any
- From: jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU
- Re: lo
- From: ucleaar <ucleaar@ucl.ac.uk>
- lo
- From: Gerald Koenig <jlk@NETCOM.COM>
- Re: lo
- From: i.alexander.bra0125@OASIS.ICL.CO.UK
- Re: lo
- From: i.alexander.bra0125@oasis.icl.co.uk
- le ninmu veridicality query
- Re: Cowan weighs in #1: specific, definite
- From: Logical Language Group <lojbab>
- Re: veridicality trivial?
- From: Logical Language Group <lojbab>
- Re: context in Lojban
- From: Logical Language Group <lojbab>
- Truth/satisfaction conditions
- From: Logical Language Group <lojbab>
- Re: Cowan weighs in #1: specific, definite
- From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
- Re: veridicality trivial?
- From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
- le ninmu veridicality query
- Re: context in Lojban
- From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
- Truth/satisfaction conditions
- From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
- Re: any
- From: i.alexander.bra0125@OASIS.ICL.CO.UK
- Re: any
- From: i.alexander.bra0125@oasis.icl.co.uk
- Re: preti zo goi .e zo nai
- From: Goran Topic <topic@MATH.HR>
- Subject: Re: any
- From: Goran Topic <topic@MATH.HR>
- Re: preti zo goi .e zo nai
- From: Goran Topic <topic@math.hr>
- Subject: Re: any
- From: Goran Topic <topic@math.hr>
- Cowan's summary: opacity and sumti-raising
- From: Logical Language Group <lojbab>
- Cowan's summary #2: "lo" vs. "da poi"
- From: Logical Language Group <lojbab>
- Cowan's summary #3: any old X at all
- From: Logical Language Group <lojbab>
- wff, lo broda...le broda
- From: Logical Language Group <lojbab>
- Outside quantifiers on masses
- From: Logical Language Group <lojbab>
- "re lo'e broda" is semantically bogus
- From: Logical Language Group <lojbab>
- "re lo'e broda" is semantically bogus
- From: Logical Language Group <lojbab>
- "ro" doesn't imply +specific
- From: Logical Language Group <lojbab>
- Cowan's summary #3: any old X at all
- From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
- "le re loi tanxe"
- From: Logical Language Group <lojbab>
- wff, lo broda...le broda
- From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
- Outside quantifiers on masses
- From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
- "re lo'e broda" is semantically bogus
- From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
- "ro" doesn't imply +specific
- From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
- "le re loi tanxe"
- From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
- Cowan's summary: opacity and sumti-raising
- From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
- Cowan's summary #2: "lo" vs. "da poi"
- From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
- Re: "re lo'e broda" is semantically bogus
- From: i.alexander.bra0125@OASIS.ICL.CO.UK
- Re: Cowan's summary: opacity and sumti-raising
- From: i.alexander.bra0125@OASIS.ICL.CO.UK
- Re: "ro" doesn't imply +specific
- From: i.alexander.bra0125@OASIS.ICL.CO.UK
- Re: Cowan's summary: opacity and sumti-raising
- From: i.alexander.bra0125@oasis.icl.co.uk
- Re: "ro" doesn't imply +specific
- From: i.alexander.bra0125@oasis.icl.co.uk
- Re: "re lo'e broda" is semantically bogus
- From: i.alexander.bra0125@oasis.icl.co.uk
- Re: two typical men
- negation translation
- Re: re loi smani
- Re: "ro" doesn't imply +specific
- From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
- Re: preti zo goi .e zo nai
- From: Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
- Re: Cowan's summary: opacity and sumti-raising
- From: Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
- Re: Cowan's summary #2: "lo" vs. "da poi"
- From: Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
- Re: Outside quantifiers on masses
- From: Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
- Re: wff, lo broda...le broda
- From: Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
- Re Cowan#2 lo, da poi
- From: Gerald Koenig <jlk@NETCOM.COM>
- Re: "re lo'e broda" is semantically bogus
- From: Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
- Re: any
- From: Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
- negation translation
- Re: two typical men
- Re: re loi smani
- Re: "ro" doesn't imply +specific
- From: ucleaar <ucleaar@ucl.ac.uk>
- Re: Cowan's summary #2: "lo" vs. "da poi"
- From: Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
- Re: preti zo goi .e zo nai
- From: Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
- Re: Outside quantifiers on masses
- From: Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
- Re: wff, lo broda...le broda
- From: Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
- Re: Cowan's summary: opacity and sumti-raising
- From: Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
- Re Cowan#2 lo, da poi
- From: Gerald Koenig <jlk@NETCOM.COM>
- Re: "re lo'e broda" is semantically bogus
- From: Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
- Re: any
- From: Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
- Re: Cowan's summary: opacity and sumti-raising
- From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
- Re: Cowan's summary: opacity and sumti-raising
- From: ucleaar <ucleaar@ucl.ac.uk>
- Re: Re Cowan#2 lo, da poi
- From: Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
- Re: Cowan's summary: opacity and sumti-raising
- From: Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
- Re: Re Cowan#2 lo, da poi
- From: Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
- Re: Cowan's summary: opacity and sumti-raising
- From: Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
- lo, da poi
- From: Gerald Koenig <jlk@NETCOM.COM>
- lo, da poi
- From: Gerald Koenig <jlk@NETCOM.COM>
- Re: "re lo'e broda" is semantically bogus
- From: Logical Language Group <lojbab>
- Re: re loi smani
- From: Logical Language Group <lojbab>
- Re: negation translation
- From: Logical Language Group <lojbab>
- Re: lo, da poi
- From: Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
- Re: "re lo'e broda" is semantically bogus
- From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
- Re: negation translation
- From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
- Re: re loi smani
- From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
- Ralph believes someone is a spy
- From: Logical Language Group <lojbab>
- Ralph believes someone is a spy
- From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
- Re: lo, da poi
- From: Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
- Re: re loi smani
- From: Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
- Re: Ralph believes someone is a spy
- Re: re loi smani
- From: Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
- Re: Ralph believes someone is a spy
- Re: preti zo goi .e zo nai
- From: Goran Topic <topic@MATH.HR>
- Re: re loi smani
- From: Goran Topic <topic@MATH.HR>
- Re: Re Cowan#2 lo, da poi
- From: Logical Language Group <lojbab>
- Re: wff, lo broda...le broda
- From: Logical Language Group <lojbab>
Mail converted by MHonArc