[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: TECH: PROPOSED CHANGE 37: Relative Clauses before names
- To: Veijo Vilva <veion@XIRON.PC.HELSINKI.FI>
- Subject: Re: TECH: PROPOSED CHANGE 37: Relative Clauses before names
- From: John Cowan <cowan@LOCKE.CCIL.ORG>
- Date: Thu, 16 Nov 1995 11:47:56 -0500
- Comments: Warning -- original Sender: tag was lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET
- In-reply-to: <199511160828.DAA28191@access1.digex.net> from "Logical Language Group" at Nov 16, 95 03:28:50 am
- Reply-to: John Cowan <cowan@LOCKE.CCIL.ORG>
- Sender: Lojban list <LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
> Please make explicit that the pause will always be required before as
> well as after the actual cmene.
Yes.
> There could also be some funky elidable effects:
>
> la noi ciska sutramau be la lojbab. djan. kau,n. would not work without
> a be'o or ku'o, but with a brivla istead of lojbab. would be fine.
A simpler case: "la pe la lojbab. ge'u .noras.", = Lojbab's Nora
(assuming that were really her name, not just a description).
--
John Cowan cowan@ccil.org
e'osai ko sarji la lojban.