Mail Index

• Thread Index

• stress and le du'u
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• .iku'i la lojbab cu so'uroi tcidu
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• splitting PA into multiple selma'o
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• self-descriptions?
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• loglan reform conlangs
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• a better gismu algorithm?
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Some comments to mark,l
  • From: Goran Topic <topic@STUDENT.MATH.HR>
• Some comments to mark,l
  • From: Goran Topic <topic@STUDENT.MATH.HR>
• l/r
  • From: Goran Topic <topic@STUDENT.MATH.HR>
• l/r
  • From: Goran Topic <topic@STUDENT.MATH.HR>
• Re: buffer vowel
  • From: Don Wiggins <dwiggins@BFSEC.BT.CO.UK>
• Re: buffer vowel
  • From: Don Wiggins <dwiggins@BFSEC.BT.CO.UK>
• Re: Some comments to mark,l
  • From: Don Wiggins <dwiggins@BFSEC.BT.CO.UK>
• Re: Some comments to mark,l
  • From: Don Wiggins <dwiggins@BFSEC.BT.CO.UK>
• Re: all the chinese whispers
  • From: Don Wiggins <dwiggins@BFSEC.BT.CO.UK>
• Re: all the chinese whispers
  • From: Don Wiggins <dwiggins@BFSEC.BT.CO.UK>
• Re: buffer vowel
  • From: Ivan A Derzhanski <iad@BGEARN.ACAD.BG>
• Re: buffer vowel
  • From: Ivan A Derzhanski <iad@BGEARN.ACAD.BG>
• Re: Some comments to mark,l
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@LOCKE.CCIL.ORG>
• Re: buffer vowel
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@LOCKE.CCIL.ORG>
• Re: buffer vowel
  • From: cowan
• Re: buffer vowel
  • From: cowan
• Re: buffer vowel
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
• Re: TECH: Pitch Accent
  • From: "Mark E. Shoulson" <shoulson@CS.COLUMBIA.EDU>
• Re: buffer vowel
  • From: Chris Bogart <cbogart@QUETZAL.COM>
• ni, jei, barely, almost
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Re: pointing
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Re: lujvo query
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Re: TECH: man bites dog problem
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Re: buffer vowel
  • From: Chris Bogart <cbogart@QUETZAL.COM>
• ni, jei, barely, almost
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Re: lujvo query
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Re: pointing
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Re: TECH: man bites dog problem
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Re: TECH: man bites dog problem
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@LOCKE.CCIL.ORG>
• Re: TECH: man bites dog problem
  • From: cowan
• Re: TECH: man bites dog problem
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
• Re: TECH: man bites dog problem
  • From: cowan
• TECH: PROPOSED CHANGE 37: Relative Clauses before names
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@LOCKE.CCIL.ORG>
• TECH: PROPOSED CHANGE 37: Relative Clauses before names
  • From: cowan
• TECH: PROPOSED CHANGE 37: Relative Clauses before names
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
• TECH: PROPOSED CHANGE 37: Relative Clauses before names
  • From: cowan
• mi xruti
  • From: Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• mi xruti
  • From: Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: perfective counting & katna
  • From: Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: perfective counting & katna
  • From: Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: lujvo query
  • From: Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: lujvo query
  • From: Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: all the chinese whispers
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: TECH: PROPOSED CHANGE 37: Relative Clauses before names
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: TECH: PROPOSED CHANGE 37: Relative Clauses before names
  • From: Ivan A Derzhanski <IAD@BGEARN.BITNET>
• Amount Abstractor: ni
  • From: "Robert J. Chassell" <bob@gnu.ai.mit.edu>
• Re: all the chinese whispers
  • From: Cyril Slobin <slobin@FEAST.FE.MSK.RU>
• Re: all the chinese whispers
  • From: Don Wiggins <dwiggins@BFSEC.BT.CO.UK>
• Re: all the chinese whispers
  • From: Ivan A Derzhanski <IAD@BGEARN.BITNET>
• Re: Some comments to mark,l
  • From: Don Wiggins <dwiggins@BFSEC.BT.CO.UK>
• Re: all the chinese whispers
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: TECH: PROPOSED CHANGE 37: Relative Clauses before names
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: TECH: PROPOSED CHANGE 37: Relative Clauses before names
  • From: Ivan A Derzhanski <IAD@BGEARN.BITNET>
• Re: all the chinese whispers
  • From: Cyril Slobin <slobin@FEAST.FE.MSK.RU>
• Re: all the chinese whispers
  • From: Don Wiggins <dwiggins@BFSEC.BT.CO.UK>
• Re: Some comments to mark,l
  • From: Don Wiggins <dwiggins@BFSEC.BT.CO.UK>
• Re: all the chinese whispers
  • From: Don Wiggins <dwiggins@BFSEC.BT.CO.UK>
• Re: all the chinese whispers
  • From: Don Wiggins <dwiggins@BFSEC.BT.CO.UK>
• Re: all the chinese whispers
  • From: Ivan A Derzhanski <IAD@BGEARN.BITNET>
• Re: buffer vowel
  • From: G R A Dunbar <G.R.A.Dunbar@EEE.RGU.AC.UK>
• Re: TECH: PROPOSED CHANGE 37: Relative Clauses before names
  • From: Jim Carter <jimc@MATH.UCLA.EDU>
• Re: TECH: PROPOSED CHANGE 37: Relative Clauses before names
  • From: Jim Carter <jimc@MATH.UCLA.EDU>
• Re: TECH: PROPOSED CHANGE 37: Relative Clauses before names
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@LOCKE.CCIL.ORG>
• Re: TECH: PROPOSED CHANGE 37: Relative Clauses before names
  • From: cowan
• Re: TECH: PROPOSED CHANGE 37: Relative Clauses before names
  • From: cowan
• Re: TECH: PROPOSED CHANGE 37: Relative Clauses before names
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
• Re: TECH: PROPOSED CHANGE 37: Relative Clauses before names
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@LOCKE.CCIL.ORG>
• Re: slinkui
  • From: Goran Topic <topic@STUDENT.MATH.HR>
• Re: buffer vowel
  • From: Goran Topic <topic@STUDENT.MATH.HR>
• Re: self-descriptions?
  • From: Goran Topic <topic@STUDENT.MATH.HR>
• Re: slinkui
  • From: Goran Topic <topic@STUDENT.MATH.HR>
• doi djan. (Re: rel clause paper)
  • From: Goran Topic <topic@STUDENT.MATH.HR>
• Re: all the chinese whispers
  • From: Goran Topic <topic@STUDENT.MATH.HR>
• Re: buffer vowel
  • From: Goran Topic <topic@STUDENT.MATH.HR>
• Re: self-descriptions?
  • From: Goran Topic <topic@STUDENT.MATH.HR>
• Re: all the chinese whispers
  • From: Goran Topic <topic@STUDENT.MATH.HR>
• Goran on phonology
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Re: stress and le du'u
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• loglan reform conlangs
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• tins and Thames
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• splitting PA into multiple selma'o
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Re: buffer vowel
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Goran on phonology
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Re: stress and le du'u
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• tins and Thames
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• loglan reform conlangs
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• splitting PA into multiple selma'o
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Re: buffer vowel
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• How jai and tu'a work
  • From: Chris Bogart <cbogart@QUETZAL.COM>
• Re: Goran on phonology
  • From: Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: TECH: PROPOSED CHANGE 37: Relative Clauses before names
  • From: Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: ni, jei, barely, almost
  • From: Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: TECH: lambda and "ka" revisited
  • From: Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: TECH: lambda and "ka" revisited
  • From: Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>