Mail Index

• Thread Index

• Re: buffer vowel
  • From: Ivan A Derzhanski <IAD@BGEARN.BITNET>
• Re: all the chinese whispers
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: slinkui
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: loglan reform conlangs
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: splitting PA into multiple selma'o
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Broken Phone
  • From: Don Wiggins <dwiggins@BFSEC.BT.CO.UK>
• Re: ni, jei, barely, almost
  • From: Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: Goran on phonology
  • From: Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: TECH: PROPOSED CHANGE 37: Relative Clauses before names
  • From: Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: TECH: lambda and "ka" revisited
  • From: Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: TECH: lambda and "ka" revisited
  • From: Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: buffer vowel
  • From: Ivan A Derzhanski <IAD@BGEARN.BITNET>
• refgrammar
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Re: all the chinese whispers
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: slinkui
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: loglan reform conlangs
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: splitting PA into multiple selma'o
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Broken Phone
  • From: Don Wiggins <dwiggins@BFSEC.BT.CO.UK>
• Re: TECH: man bites dog problem
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Re: TECH: PROPOSED CHANGE 37: Relative Clauses before names
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Re: self-descriptions?
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Re: TECH: man bites dog problem
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Re: self-descriptions?
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Re: TECH: PROPOSED CHANGE 37: Relative Clauses before names
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Buffer and Vowel phonology
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Buffer and Vowel phonology
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Chinese Whispers #2 - Report
  • From: Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Chinese Whispers #2 - Report
  • From: Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: Some comments to mark,l
  • From: "Mark L. Vines" <MarkLVines@EWORLD.COM>
• Re: Some comments to mark,l
  • From: "Mark L. Vines" <MarkLVines@EWORLD.COM>
• scalar polarity
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• xe'u, PA, NU
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Re: all the chinese whispers
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Re: How jai and tu'a work
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• scalar polarity
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• xe'u, PA, NU
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Re: all the chinese whispers
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Re: How jai and tu'a work
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• CONLANG:Complex Grammar: It starts to come together
  • From: "Christopher B. Collins" <ccollins@pen.k12.va.us>
• Re: Goran on phonology
  • From: Goran Topic <topic@STUDENT.MATH.HR>
• Re: self-descriptions?
  • From: Goran Topic <topic@STUDENT.MATH.HR>
• Re: Chinese Whispers #2 - Report
  • From: Goran Topic <topic@STUDENT.MATH.HR>
• Re: Goran on phonology
  • From: Goran Topic <topic@STUDENT.MATH.HR>
• Re: self-descriptions?
  • From: Goran Topic <topic@STUDENT.MATH.HR>
• Re: Chinese Whispers #2 - Report
  • From: Goran Topic <topic@STUDENT.MATH.HR>
• Re: How jai and tu'a work
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: Goran on phonology
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• vuo
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• le reroi cuplinfanva cuntu
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Re: TECH: lambda and "ka" revisited
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Re: Buffer and Vowel phonology
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Re: How jai and tu'a work
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• vuo
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• le reroi cuplinfanva cuntu
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Re: Goran on phonology
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Re: TECH: lambda and "ka" revisited
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Re: Buffer and Vowel phonology
  • From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
• Re: scalar polarity
  • From: Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: scalar polarity
  • From: Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: Goran on phonology
  • From: Chris Bogart <cbogart@QUETZAL.COM>
• Re: le reroi cuplinfanva cuntu
  • From: Chris Bogart <cbogart@QUETZAL.COM>
• Re: Goran on phonology
  • From: Chris Bogart <cbogart@QUETZAL.COM>
• Re: le reroi cuplinfanva cuntu
  • From: Chris Bogart <cbogart@QUETZAL.COM>
• Re: xe'u, PA, NU
  • From: Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: xe'u, PA, NU
  • From: Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: le reroi cuplinfanva cuntu
  • From: Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: le reroi cuplinfanva cuntu
  • From: Jorge Llambias <jorge@PHYAST.PITT.EDU>
• Re: TECH: lambda and "ka" revisited
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: TECH: lambda and "ka" revisited
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: Buffer and Vowel phonology
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: Buffer and Vowel phonology
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: Re[2]: jboste sorcu
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@access.digex.net>
• Re: le reroi cuplinfanva cuntu
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• Re: le reroi cuplinfanva cuntu
  • From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
• le reroi cuplinfanva cuntu
  • From: Don Wiggins <dwiggins@BFSEC.BT.CO.UK>
• le reroi cuplinfanva cuntu
  • From: Don Wiggins <dwiggins@BFSEC.BT.CO.UK>
• Re: Broken Phone
  • From: Cyril Slobin <slobin@FEAST.FE.MSK.RU>
• Re: Broken Phone
  • From: Cyril Slobin <slobin@FEAST.FE.MSK.RU>
• Re: TECH: PROPOSED CHANGE 37: Relative Clauses before names
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@LOCKE.CCIL.ORG>
• Re: self-descriptions?
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@LOCKE.CCIL.ORG>
• Re: Broken Phone
  • From: Don Wiggins <dwiggins@BFSEC.BT.CO.UK>
• Re: TECH: PROPOSED CHANGE 37: Relative Clauses before names
  • From: cowan
• Re: TECH: PROPOSED CHANGE 37: Relative Clauses before names
  • From: cowan
• Re: TECH: PROPOSED CHANGE 37: Relative Clauses before names
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
• Re: Buffer and Vowel phonology
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@LOCKE.CCIL.ORG>
• Re: self-descriptions?
  • From: cowan
• Re: self-descriptions?
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
• Re: self-descriptions?
  • From: cowan
• Re: Buffer and Vowel phonology
  • From: cowan
• Re: Buffer and Vowel phonology
  • From: cowan
• Re: Buffer and Vowel phonology
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
• Re: Broken Phone
  • From: Don Wiggins <dwiggins@BFSEC.BT.CO.UK>
• Re: Goran on phonology
  • From: "Mark E. Shoulson" <shoulson@CS.COLUMBIA.EDU>
• Re: Goran on phonology
  • From: "Mark E. Shoulson" <shoulson@CS.COLUMBIA.EDU>
• Re: xe'u, PA, NU
  • From: cowan
• Re: xe'u, PA, NU
  • From: cowan
• Re: xe'u, PA, NU
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
• Re: How jai and tu'a work
  • From: cowan
• Re: How jai and tu'a work
  • From: cowan
• Re: How jai and tu'a work
  • From: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>