[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Goran on phonology
- To: John Cowan <cowan@LOCKE.CCIL.ORG>
- Subject: Re: Goran on phonology
- From: "Mark E. Shoulson" <shoulson@CS.COLUMBIA.EDU>
- Date: Mon, 20 Nov 1995 10:27:10 -0500
- In-reply-to: <199511162006.PAA10528@cs.columbia.edu> (message from ucleaar on Thu, 16 Nov 1995 19:56:42 +0000)
- Reply-to: "Mark E. Shoulson" <shoulson@CS.COLUMBIA.EDU>
- Sender: Lojban list <LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
>Date: Thu, 16 Nov 1995 19:56:42 +0000
>From: ucleaar <ucleaar%UCL.AC.UK@CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU>
>> I didn't believe my professor when he told me that Rg Veda is recited
>> rather than sung. I said, "But I heard melody!". He said, that's just
>> accents. Sama Veda is Rg Veda in song."). AFAIK.
>I don't believe it either. A Tamil once sang me some, and I still remember
>the tune of the start - I can't write out the notes because I'd need
>access to a musical instrument to work it out on, but it sort of reminds
>me of Pink Floyd's _The Wall_. Oh yes, and it was different when recited,
>e.g. AgnimIlepUrohItam when sung but AgnimIlepUritAm when recited.
FWIW, I have it right here in Devanagari, from the Sanskrit Reader by
Charles Lanman, and it reads "agnimi=.le purohita.m" (i= is long i, .l is
cerebral l [a letter which did not survive into Classical Sanskrit], and .m
is anusvara, a nasalization of the preceding vowel). I won't hazard to
speak authoritatively as to accent.
~mark