[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: whether (was Re: ni, jei, perfectionism)
And Rosta wrote:
>
> Jorge to Lojbab:
> > To see the difference between {ce'u} and {makau} it is useful
> > to consider examples where they appear together. For instance:
> >
> > la rik zmadu la alis le ka ce'u mitre makau
> > Rick exceeds Alice in how much they measure.
> >
> > {ce'u} stands for the holder of the property, in this case Rick
> > and Alice. {makau} is the question that has to be answered,
> > in this case in order to make a comparison.
>
> BTW, this type of Q-kau that we get with zmadu and frica (and
> certain other selbri) is semantically very different from
> the sort we get with epistemic selbri. The essence of Q-kau here
> is where we have two variables, where the value of each depends
> on the value of the other.
>
> Currently I think that it is glico influence that makes us use
> Q-kau here. That said, it is the only way to do it if we
> insist on using {zmadu/frica fi le ka}.
I agree, and suggest that "ni [ce'u] mitre" is the Right Thing.
--
John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan cowan@ccil.org
e'osai ko sarji la lojban
From LOJBAN@CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU Mon Dec 15 16:14:04 1997
for <cowan@LOCKE.CCIL.ORG>; Mon, 15 Dec 1997 16:13:55 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <199712152113.QAA09412@locke.ccil.org>
Reply-To: John Cowan <cowan@DRV.CBC.COM>
Sender: Lojban list <LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
From: John Cowan <cowan@DRV.CBC.COM>
Organization: Lojban Peripheral
Subject: Re: whether (was Re: ni, jei, perfectionism)
X-To: Lojban List <lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu>
To: John Cowan <cowan@LOCKE.CCIL.ORG>
Status: OR
X-Mozilla-Status: 0011
Content-Length: 389
la .and. cusku di'e
> Lojbab to Jorge:
> > mi zanru leka melbi
> >
> > I approve of beauty.
>
> You need a ce`a for the Lojban meaning to be clear.
Heuristically, I think that the first open place gets
the ce'a, in the absence of an explicit one.
--
John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan cowan@ccil.org
e'osai ko sarji la lojban