Mail Thread Index

• Date Index

• [lojban] Re: ba'e, (continued)
  • [lojban] Re: ba'e, Theodore Reed
  • [lojban] Re: ba'e, Philip Newton
• Re: kennings, Chris Bogart
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: kennings, Robin Turner
  • Re: kennings, Chris Bogart
  • Re: kennings, Thanatos
  • Re: kennings, Logical Language Group
    • [lojban] Re: kennings, zacch . edgmon
• Re: UNESCO RED BOOK ON ENDANGERED LANGUAGES: EUROPE, Tapani Salminen
• Problem fixed (maybe), Logical Language Group
• cold logic (was "re:kennings"), Robin Turner
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: cold logic (was "re:kennings"), Chris Bogart
• Beginner question on meaning of "le ... xu ku" and "le ... ku xu", Thanatos
• Re: partial instantiations (was: Re: GLI Re: do all nu's ha, And Rosta
• beginner's question, Robin Turner
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: beginner's question, JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS
  • Re: beginner's question, Chris Bogart
  • Re: beginner's question, Logical Language Group
• flowers (was: "beginner's question"), Robin Turner
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: flowers (was: "beginner's question"), JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS
• ba'e (was: kau), John Cowan
• CAha (was: partial instantiations), John Cowan
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: CAha (was: partial instantiations), And Rosta
    • Re: CAha (was: partial instantiations), John Cowan
  • Re: CAha (was: partial instantiations), John Cowan
• Re: cold logic, Robin Turner
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: cold logic, bob
• Re: Beginner question on meaning of "le ... xu ku" and "le ... ku xu", Chris Bogart
• Re: flowers (was "re: beginner's question"), Logical Language Group
• whether (was Re: ni, jei, perfectionism), And Rosta
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: whether (was Re: ni, jei, perfectionism), Logical Language Group
  • Re: whether (was Re: ni, jei, perfectionism), And Rosta
  • Re: whether (was Re: ni, jei, perfectionism), JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS
    • Re: whether (was Re: ni, jei, perfectionism), John Cowan
  • Re: whether (was Re: ni, jei, perfectionism), John Cowan
  • Re: whether (was Re: ni, jei, perfectionism), And Rosta
  • Re: whether (was Re: ni, jei, perfectionism), Chris Bogart
  • Re: whether (was Re: ni, jei, perfectionism), Logical Language Group
  • Re: whether (was Re: ni, jei, perfectionism), JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS
  • Re: whether (was Re: ni, jei, perfectionism), Logical Language Group
  • Re: whether (was Re: ni, jei, perfectionism), And Rosta
    • Re: whether (was Re: ni, jei, perfectionism), John Cowan
  • Re: whether (was Re: ni, jei, perfectionism), And Rosta
  • Re: whether (was Re: ni, jei, perfectionism), And Rosta
  • Re: whether (was Re: ni, jei, perfectionism), John Cowan
  • Re: whether (was Re: ni, jei, perfectionism), Carl Burke
  • Re: whether (was Re: ni, jei, perfectionism), John Cowan
  • Re: whether (was Re: ni, jei, perfectionism), John Cowan
  • Re: whether (was Re: ni, jei, perfectionism), JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS
  • Re: whether (was Re: ni, jei, perfectionism), JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS
  • Re: whether (was Re: ni, jei, perfectionism), Logical Language Group
    • Re: whether (was Re: ni, jei, perfectionism), John Cowan
  • Re: whether (was Re: ni, jei, perfectionism), And Rosta
  • Re: whether (was Re: ni, jei, perfectionism), And Rosta
  • Re: whether (was Re: ni, jei, perfectionism), And Rosta
  • Re: whether (was Re: ni, jei, perfectionism), Carl Burke
  • Re: whether (was Re: ni, jei, perfectionism), Logical Language Group
  • Re: whether (was Re: ni, jei, perfectionism), And Rosta
  • Re: whether (was Re: ni, jei, perfectionism), And Rosta
  • Re: whether (was Re: ni, jei, perfectionism), Jim Carter
  • Re: whether (was Re: ni, jei, perfectionism), Jim Carter
  • Re: whether (was Re: ni, jei, perfectionism), Carl Burke
  • Re: whether (was Re: ni, jei, perfectionism), John Cowan
  • Re: whether (was Re: ni, jei, perfectionism), cowan
  • Re: whether (was Re: ni, jei, perfectionism), cowan
  • Re: whether (was Re: ni, jei, perfectionism), Logical Language Group
  • Re: whether (was Re: ni, jei, perfectionism), JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS
  • Re: whether (was Re: ni, jei, perfectionism), And Rosta
  • Re: whether (was Re: ni, jei, perfectionism), And Rosta
  • Re: whether (was Re: ni, jei, perfectionism), And Rosta
  • Re: whether (was Re: ni, jei, perfectionism), Carl Burke
  • Re: whether (was Re: ni, jei, perfectionism), JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS
  • Re: whether (was Re: ni, jei, perfectionism), And Rosta
    • Re: whether (was Re: ni, jei, perfectionism), John Cowan
  • Re: whether (was Re: ni, jei, perfectionism), Jorge J. Llambías
  • Re: whether (was Re: ni, jei, perfectionism), Jorge J. Llambías
• indirect Qs (was Re: On logji lojbo discussions), And Rosta
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: indirect Qs (was Re: On logji lojbo discussions), Lee Daniel Crocker (none)
  • Re: indirect Qs (was Re: On logji lojbo discussions), JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS
  • Re: indirect Qs (was Re: On logji lojbo discussions), Jim Carter
  • Re: indirect Qs (was Re: On logji lojbo discussions), And Rosta
  • Re: indirect Qs (was Re: On logji lojbo discussions), JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS
• Logical connectives and questions (and: Re: Beginner question on meaning of "le ... xu ku" and "le ... ku xu"), Thanatos
• xi, kennings, jvajvo (was Re: Are tanru really metaphors?), And Rosta
  • Re: xi, kennings, jvajvo (was Re: Are tanru really metaphors?), John Cowan
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: xi, kennings, jvajvo (was Re: Are tanru really metaphors?), John Cowan
• Re: Beginner question on meaning of "le ... xu ku" and "le ..., And Rosta
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Beginner question on meaning of "le ... xu ku" and "le ..., Thanatos
• Q-less kau (was Re: ni, jei, perfectionism), And Rosta
  • Re: Q-less kau (was Re: ni, jei, perfectionism), John Cowan
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Q-less kau (was Re: ni, jei, perfectionism), John Cowan
  • Re: Q-less kau (was Re: ni, jei, perfectionism), Logical Language Group
• papilionine, Ronald Hale-Evans
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: papilionine, And Rosta
• Lojban text production (RE: ni, jei, perfectionism), JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Lojban text production (RE: ni, jei, perfectionism), Chris Bogart
  • Re: Lojban text production (RE: ni, jei, perfectionism), Logical Language Group
  • Re: Lojban text production (RE: ni, jei, perfectionism), And Rosta
  • Re: Lojban text production (RE: ni, jei, perfectionism), JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS
• le vofli tapla, Chris Bogart