Re: [lojban] Set operations?

[Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@csclub.uwaterloo.ca>]

pycyn@aol.com writes:
>In a message dated 12/1/2000 1:49:07 PM Central Standard Time, 
>rlpowell@csclub.uwaterloo.ca writes:
>
>
>> So, was there ever any consensus on set operations?  In particular, have
>> we agreed on a way to do either set XOR or set difference, because if
>> not, we don't have a complete set of set operations, and that would
>> suck.
>> 
>No consensus that I see, though, if we stay out of MEX, there doen't seem to 
>be a problem, since we have XOR and relative difference and complement and 
>what you will.  

We do?  Outside of MEXs?  How, exactly?

-Robin

-- 
http://www.csclub.uwaterloo.ca/~rlpowell/ 	BTW, I'm male, honest.
Despite not getting very emotional about it, the fact that quantum
entanglement doesn't allow transmission of information is probably the
most profound dissapointment I've ever experienced.  -- RLPowell