Re: djuno: the key issue (was: Re: Fwd: Re: [lojban] Random lojban questions/annoyances.)

[John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>]

And Rosta wrote:


> It seems to me that the discussion has converged on just two rival
> definitions that differ on one point: for "x1 djuno x2 x3 x4" to be true,
> does x2 have to be entailed by x4 (Position I), or is it sufficient for x1 
> to believe (possibly erroneously) that x1 is entailed by x4 (Position II)?

"... x2 is entailed by x4", I suppose.

> Lojbab says (II), and (II) is what I would advocate too. But I think (I)
> is closer to established usage and also to the views of the Three
> Magi (pc, John & Jorge).

No, I hold (II) as well.

--
There is / one art             || John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
no more / no less              || http://www.reutershealth.com
to do / all things             || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
with art- / lessness           \\ -- Piet Hein