[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[lojban] Re: nai in UI (was: BPFK phpbb)
On Tue, Apr 29, 2003 at 07:58:33PM -0400, John Cowan wrote:
> Robin Lee Powell scripsit:
>
> > For the same reason you can't say "pu bai klama": LALR(1). If
> > you haven't gotten used to doing "pu je bai klama", you either
> > are new, or aren't interested in doing proper formal lojban
> > anyways.
>
> Actually "pu bai klama" is fine: it's "pu [ku] bai klama". The
> rules about tenses are really pretty nugatory: if you violate
> them, the parser will just insert ku's anyhow.
So that would be a bug in jbofi'e, then?
mi pu bai klama
--------------------
SYNTAX ERROR IN TEXT
--------------------
Misparsed token :
klama [BRIVLA] (line 1, col 11)
Latest successfully parsed tokens :
bai [BAI] (line 1, col 7)
MARKER : PRIVATE_START_BAI
pu [PU] (line 1, col 4)
mi [KOhA3] (line 1, col 1)
--------------------
> Furthermore, the tense part of the grammar is not at all LALR(1).
Oh. What is it, then?
-Robin
--
http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** I'm a *male* Robin.
.i le pamoi velru'e zo'u crepu le plibu taxfu
.i le remoi velru'e zo'u mo .i le cimoi velru'e zo'u ba'e prali .uisai
http://www.lojban.org/ *** to sa'a cu'u lei pibyta'u cridrnoma toi
From lojban-out@lojban.org Tue Apr 29 17:03:36 2003
Return-Path: <lojban-out@lojban.org>
X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_6_6); 30 Apr 2003 00:03:36 -0000
Received: (qmail 6894 invoked from network); 30 Apr 2003 00:03:36 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216)
by m13.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 30 Apr 2003 00:03:36 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175)
by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 30 Apr 2003 00:03:36 -0000
Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.12)
id 19Af4R-0002vL-00
for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Tue, 29 Apr 2003 17:03:35 -0700
Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain)
by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12)
id 19Af4G-0002um-00; Tue, 29 Apr 2003 17:03:24 -0700
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Tue, 29 Apr 2003 17:03:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rlpowell by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.12)
id 19Af3x-0002uE-00
for lojban-list@lojban.org; Tue, 29 Apr 2003 17:03:05 -0700
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 17:03:05 -0700
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban] Re: nai in UI (was: BPFK phpbb)
Message-ID: <20030430000305.GR20953@digitalkingdom.org>
Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org
References: <20030429143319.GA5227@allusion.net> <20030429161151.54722.qmail@web20511.mail.yahoo.com> <20030429162617.GH20953@digitalkingdom.org> <20030429235833.GE12348@ccil.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20030429235833.GE12348@ccil.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
X-archive-position: 5023
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org
Precedence: bulk
X-list: lojban-list
X-eGroups-From: Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>
From: Robin Lee Powell <lojban-out@lojban.org>
Reply-To: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790
X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out
On Tue, Apr 29, 2003 at 07:58:33PM -0400, John Cowan wrote:
> Robin Lee Powell scripsit:
>
> > For the same reason you can't say "pu bai klama": LALR(1). If
> > you haven't gotten used to doing "pu je bai klama", you either
> > are new, or aren't interested in doing proper formal lojban
> > anyways.
>
> Actually "pu bai klama" is fine: it's "pu [ku] bai klama". The
> rules about tenses are really pretty nugatory: if you violate
> them, the parser will just insert ku's anyhow.
So that would be a bug in jbofi'e, then?
mi pu bai klama
--------------------
SYNTAX ERROR IN TEXT
--------------------
Misparsed token :
klama [BRIVLA] (line 1, col 11)
Latest successfully parsed tokens :
bai [BAI] (line 1, col 7)
MARKER : PRIVATE_START_BAI
pu [PU] (line 1, col 4)
mi [KOhA3] (line 1, col 1)
--------------------
> Furthermore, the tense part of the grammar is not at all LALR(1).
Oh. What is it, then?
-Robin
--
http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** I'm a *male* Robin.
.i le pamoi velru'e zo'u crepu le plibu taxfu
.i le remoi velru'e zo'u mo .i le cimoi velru'e zo'u ba'e prali .uisai
http://www.lojban.org/ *** to sa'a cu'u lei pibyta'u cridrnoma toi