On Wednesday 09 January 2002 20:10, randl. nortmn. wrote:
> Consider the following structure:
>
> ko'a .e ko'e noi broda
>
> In this case, it seems that "noi broda" attaches only to "ko'e", not
> to both "ko'a" and "ko'e". How might one introduce a relative clause
> meant to be attached to both? Is it even possible?
ko'a .e ko'e vu'o noi broda.
mu'omi'e pier.