[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [lojban] Relative Clauses and Connectives
- To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
- Subject: Re: [lojban] Relative Clauses and Connectives
- From: "randl. nortmn." <lojbanlists@wonderclown.com>
- Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2002 22:33:22 -0500
- In-reply-to: <0201092018160C.10006@neofelis>
- References: <20020110011048.GA10286@aerosol> <0201092018160C.10006@neofelis>
- Sender: Randall Nortman <randy@wonderclown.com>
- User-agent: Mutt/1.3.24i
On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 08:18:16PM -0500, Pierre Abbat wrote:
> On Wednesday 09 January 2002 20:10, randl. nortmn. wrote:
> > Consider the following structure:
> >
> > ko'a .e ko'e noi broda
> >
> > In this case, it seems that "noi broda" attaches only to "ko'e", not
> > to both "ko'a" and "ko'e". How might one introduce a relative clause
> > meant to be attached to both? Is it even possible?
>
> ko'a .e ko'e vu'o noi broda.
.ua.o'anai ki'e
I combed the chapter on connectives thoroughly, but completely
neglected to consult the chapter on relative clauses.
mu'omi'e randl.