Re: [lojban] fu'ivla with lujvo as rafsi?

["Jorge Llambias" <jjllambias@hotmail.com>]

la filip cusku di'e

> Is it possible to make type III fu'ivla using lujvo stems as pseudo-rafsi?

The stem has to be a consonant ending rafsi. Anything else
can cause trouble.

> I ask because I saw in the Nicene Creed as translated by nitcion (see, for
> example, http://balance.wiw.org/~jkominek/lojban/9109/msg00033.html , or
> nicely formatted as http://www.lojban.org/files/texts/credo ), the word
> "cesprenrapostolo", which appears to me to be intended as 
> cespren-r-apostolo
> (or possibly cespre-n-rapostolo). That is, it uses the lujvo "cesprenu"
> (with pseudo-rafsi cespren-) or "cespre" as the "rafsi" of the fu'ivla.

I think {cesprenrapostolo} breaks as {ce sprenrapostolo},
because "spr" is a valid initial cluster. (I'm not 100%
sure this is the rule though.)

In any case, the stem has to end in a consonant and the
lojbanized borrowing has to start with a consonant, so neither
cespre-n-rapostolo nor cespren-r-apostolo are of this type
of fu'ivla.

> Is this sort of thing possible? If not, what would the "orthodox" form have
> to be? Something like "censrnapostolo" or "prenrnapostolo" -- or perhaps
> "lijdrnapostolo"?

The most orthodox forms would be {censrxapostolo}, {prenrxapostolo},
{lidjrxapostolo}.

> (I'm using -rn- rather than -nr- as glue+crunchy consonant since I think 
> the
> n- is a better crunchy, since it hearkens to the accusative "apostolon", so
> the glue reverts to the default -r-.)

The usual way to deal with words that start with a vowel
is to add a x-. Sticking always to the same consonant has
the advantage that you reduce the number of doubtful cases.

mu'o mi'e xorxes



_________________________________________________________________
MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: 
http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx