[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lojban] General comment: 'here'.

To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: Re: [lojban] General comment: 'here'.
From: Robin Lee Powell <lojban-out@lojban.org>
Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2002 13:40:46 -0700
In-reply-to: <20020906025706.GA4591@barsoom.net>
Mail-followup-to: lojban-list@lojban.org
References: <20020905233937.GL14107@chain.digitalkingdom.org> <20020906025706.GA4591@barsoom.net>
Reply-to: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
User-agent: Mutt/1.4i

On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 09:57:06PM -0500, the Edward Blevins wrote:
> I would argue that just because an english sentence uses "here" the
> lojban transaltion doesn't always need to treat it as a sumti.

Absolutely.  Unfortunately, I can't remember the original example.  8)

-Robin

-- 
http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ 	BTW, I'm male, honest.
le datni cu djica le nu zifre .iku'i .oi le so'e datni cu to'e te pilno
je xlali -- RLP 				http://www.lojban.org/

References:
- General comment: 'here'.
  - From: Robin Lee Powell <lojban-out@lojban.org>
- Re: [lojban] General comment: 'here'.
  - From: the Edward Blevins <thedward@barsoom.net>

Prev by Date: Re: [lojban] another "simple" translation
Next by Date: Re: [lojban] another "simple" translation
Previous by thread: Re: [lojban] General comment: 'here'.
Next by thread: Minor error in main word list.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread