[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lojban] another "simple" translation

To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: Re: [lojban] another "simple" translation
From: Pierre Abbat <phma@webjockey.net>
Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2002 18:16:43 -0400
In-reply-to: <20020906203817.GB23094@chain.digitalkingdom.org>
References: <016301c25510$879323c0$f89803d5@oemcomputer> <02090520503101.18151@neofelis> <20020906203817.GB23094@chain.digitalkingdom.org>
Reply-to: phma@webjockey.net
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org

On Friday 06 September 2002 16:38, Robin Lee Powell wrote:
li'o
> > "le" is allowed; "la", "lai", "la'i", and "doi" are not. The name is
> > Léon Werth, btw.
>
> In that case, jbofihe has a bug:
>
> rlpowell@please> jbofihe -x
> leon.
> Unrecognizable word 'leon' at line 1 column 1
> rlpowell@please> jbofihe -x
> luon.
> luon. /[NAME]/

Looks like you are using a different version than I am. Try "laos" and 
"la,os". The version I have (0.38) calls "laos" a cmene and "la,os" a 
breakup, which are both wrong because "ao" is not a Lojban diphthong, and 
",os" isn't a possible Lojban word.

phma

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [lojban] another "simple" translation
  - From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>

References:
- another "simple" translation
  - From: "G. Dyke" <gordon.dyke@bluewin.ch>
- Re: [lojban] another "simple" translation
  - From: Pierre Abbat <phma@webjockey.net>
- Re: [lojban] another "simple" translation
  - From: Robin Lee Powell <lojban-out@lojban.org>

Prev by Date: Re: [lojban] General comment: 'here'.
Next by Date: Re: [lojban] another "simple" translation
Previous by thread: Re: [lojban] another "simple" translation
Next by thread: Re: [lojban] another "simple" translation
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread