[lojban] Re: On what there isn't

[robin <lojban-out@lojban.org>]

pycyn@aol.com wrote:

> Actually not.  The difference is not crucial,  however, for the 
> present issue.  What is important is that {la} is a subclass of {le} 
> and so assumes that there is something to which the expression refers.
Put that way, it makes more sense.

robin.tr

--
"Mix a little foolishness with your serious plans.
It's lovely to be silly at the right moment" - Horace

Robin Turner
IDMYO
Bilkent Üniversitesi
Ankara 06533

http://www.bilkent.edu.tr/~robin