[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lojban] Re: paroi ro mentu


la djorden cusku di'e


> See the section starting on pg. 407.

I dunno where that is; I don't have a hardcopy (chapter+section is
better).  But you're right about the expansions since I misthunk
the truth function.


Ch.16 section 12.

When using the hardcopy, page number is much better, because it is
difficult to find the chapters by number. The only place the number
appears is at the beginning of the chapter. It's unfortunate that
chapter numbers were not used in every page, or at least to label
the examples. We should take this into account for the coming books.


So e has scope then, and it matters where you put the naku boundary
with regard to it, etc.


Right. It matters where you put the naku boundary, quantifiers,
other connectives, and anything else that has scope.


But  I still don't see the relevance here
to which convention is used for tag+sumti scoping.  We still can
interpret
  paroiku ko'a .e ko'e broda
as
  ko'a paroi broda .ije ko'e paroi broda
because floating tenses work differently than naku.


We can have special rules for every case if we like, but it is better
to have a uniform rule. Floating tenses work essentially like naku,
I don't see why you would say they work differently.


And
  paroi ko'a .e ko'e broda
as
  paroi ko'a broda .ije paroi ko'e broda


That's what I want, so we agree about this case. But for me this
is the exact same case as {paroi ro le re co'e cu broda}.

mu'o mi'e xorxes


_________________________________________________________________
Join the world?s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. http://www.hotmail.com