[lojban] Re: zo'e =? su'o de (was Re: What the heck is this crap?)

[Invent Yourself <xod@thestonecutters.net>]

On Wed, 6 Nov 2002, And Rosta wrote:

> Jordan:
> > > However, the so-called "inner quantifier" functions as an indicator
> > > of cardinality. I don't see why a set of cardinality ro has to be
> > > a set of cardinality su'o. This is a subject of ongoing debate on
> > > Jboske
> >
> > If ro is importing (and apparently it is), it does
>
> This is debatable. Firstly, the fact that quantifier ro is importing
> does not not entail that cardinality ro entails su'o. Secondly,
> it is not necessarily ro that it importing: I hold to the view that
> it is da that is importing, so that just as {ro da poi broda} entails
> {da broda}, so does {no da poi broda}.



But {da broda} = {su'oda broda}.



-- 
"In the Soviet Union, government controls industry. In the United
States, industry controls government. That is the principal
structural difference between the two great oligarchies of our
time." -- Edward Abbey