[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: What the heck is this crap?



Oh, and a meta-note?

Now you know how I felt about having to relearn {ka... ce'u}.

Folks, I may be regarded as tainted by hardlinerism in saying this, but really, relax. This is not a disaster. Just as {ka.. ce'u} wasn't. But it does accord with how we understand scoping to work in general; and yes, I believe that scoping takes precedence over place conversion.

If enough people feel it shouldn't, then it won't happen in actual spoken Lojban. But the scoping thing is, I believe, consistent with the spirit of Lojban. It's *loj*-ban for a reason, after all. You can say the scoping rule is a natural-language inspired piece of arbitrariness, shoehorned into formal logic; but there does have to be *a* rule for scoping somewhere. If {ro da cu xebni su'o de} == {su'o de cu se xebni ro da}, then how do we pick whether the primary meaning is AxEy or EyAx? By the unconverted bridi? But what if we wanted to define {bu'a} as {se xebni}? Would {su'o de cu bu'a ro da} still mean "everyone hates something"?

But yes. We do need a _Lojban for Intermediates_. And it needs to be smooth and paedagogical -- the formal definition can wait, or can stay on 'that other list'.

Btw, this is why the list schism is bullshit, as far as I'm concerned. Naturalists ignore what the jboskeists say at their own peril. And the jboskeists bore non-jboskeists shitless --- more importantly, to the point of tuning out --- at their own peril.

Yeah. This dictionary compilation sure is going to be a barrel of laughs... :-|
--
**** **** **** **** **** **** **** **** **** **** **** **** **** **** ****
* Dr Nick Nicholas, Linguistics/French & Italian    nickn@unimelb.edu.au *
  University of Melbourne, Australia             http://www.opoudjis.net
*    "Eschewing obfuscatory verbosity of locutional rendering, the       *
  circumscriptional appelations are excised." --- W. Mann & S. Thompson,
* _Rhetorical Structure Theory: A Theory of Text Organisation_, 1987.    *
**** **** **** **** **** **** **** **** **** **** **** **** **** **** ****