On Sun, 1 Dec 2002 20:50:37 -0600 Jordan DeLong <fracture@allusion.net> wrote: > "Let usage decide" refers to a time (which we are not anywhere near) > in the distant future when people can fluently speak lojban. It > does not refer to mistakes people make when learning. Usage is not > sufficient to decide anything right now, and of the usage which > exists there's barely any ka'enai---there's only a few people who > would rather change it to be correct than to just take a look at > the BNF and learn what the grammar for tenses really is (CAhA is > not just like PU, neither is ZAhO, etc). Amen! One of the things I fear most about the future of Lojban is the potential for "standard errors". I think even Lojbab has said that the biggest hurdle we initial speakers of the language face is that of bootstrapping. Letting the usage of non-fluent people decide would be, IMO, a very bad idea. .iesai le pu'i manri bo selsrera cu cmima le'i traji selterpa be mi bei ca le lojbo balvi .i ti'e la lojbab pu cusku le du'u le nu cfarygau cu traji ternabmi romi poi krasi pilno le bangu .i le nu curmi le za'i le nunpilno pe le nalcertu prenu cu jai jdice keikei xlali Heh, hope I didn't hose up that translation too badly. -- Theodore Reed (rizen/bancus) -==- http://www.surreality.us/ ~OpenPGP Signed/Encrypted Mail Preferred; Finger me for my public key!~ "We have committed a greater crime, and for this crime there is no name. What punishment awaits us if it be discovered we know not, for no such crime has come in the memory of men and there are no laws to provide for it." -- Equality 7-2521, Ayn Rand's Anthem
Attachment:
pgp0PkzDdJAH_.pgp
Description: PGP signature