Mail Thread Index

• Date Index

• [lojban] Re: Specific example of Sapir-Whorf in English OR How Lojban made me think more clearly, (continued)
  • [lojban] Re: Specific example of Sapir-Whorf in English OR How Lojban made me think more clearly, Jordan DeLong
  • [lojban] Re: Specific example of Sapir-Whorf in English OR How Lojban made me think more clearly, Invent Yourself
    • [lojban] Re: Specific example of Sapir-Whorf in English OR How Lojbanmade me think more clearly, Craig
    • [lojban] Re: Specific example of Sapir-Whorf in English OR How Lojban made me think more clearly, Avital Oliver
  • [lojban] Re: Specific example of Sapir-Whorf in English OR How Lojban made me think more clearly, Theodore Reed
• Re: [lojban] Why we should cancel the vote or all vote NO (was RE: Official Statement- LLG Board approves new baseline policy, Jorge Llambias
• [lojban] Re: Why we should cancel the vote or all vote NO (was RE: Official Statement- LLG Board approves new baseline policy, Nick Nicholas
  • [lojban] Re: Why we should cancel the vote or all vote NO (was RE: Official Statement- LLG Board approves new baseline policy, Jordan DeLong
  • RE: [lojban] Re: Why we should cancel the vote or all vote NO (was RE: Official Statement- LLG Board approves new baseline policy, And Rosta
    • BP & unintelligible cmavo (was: RE: Re: Why we should cancel the vote or all vote NO (was RE: Official Statement- LLG Board approves new baseline policy, And Rosta
    • RE: [lojban] Re: Why we should cancel the vote or all vote NO (was RE: Official Statement- LLG Board approves new baseline policy, Robert LeChevalier
      • [lojban] Re: Why we should cancel the vote or all vote NO (was RE: Official Statement- LLG Board approves new baseline policy, Jordan DeLong
      • [lojban] Prayers to Lord Zipf (was: Why we should cancel the vote or all vote NO (was Official Statement- LLG Board approves new baseline policy)), Invent Yourself
      • [lojban] Re: Prayers to Lord Zipf (was: Why we should cancel the vote or all voteNO (was Official Statement- LLG Board approves new baseline policy)), And Rosta
      • [lojban] Re: Why we should cancel the vote or all vote NO (was RE: Official Statement- LLG Board approves new baseline policy, And Rosta
      • [lojban] Re: Why we should cancel the vote or all vote NO (was RE: Official Statement- LLG Board approves new baseline policy, Invent Yourself
      • RE: [lojban] Re: Why we should cancel the vote or all vote NO (was RE: Official Statement- LLG Board approves new baseline policy, And Rosta
      • [lojban] Re: Why we should cancel the vote or all vote NO (was RE: Official Statement- LLG Board approves new baseline policy, Jordan DeLong
      • [lojban] Re: Why we should cancel the vote or all vote NO (was RE: Official Statement- LLG Board approves new baseline policy, And Rosta
      • Re: [lojban] Re: Why we should cancel the vote or all vote NO (was RE: Official Statement- LLG Board approves new baseline policy, Logical Language Group, Inc.
      • RE: [lojban] Re: Why we should cancel the vote or all vote NO (was RE: Official Statement- LLG Board approves new baseline policy, And Rosta
      • Re: [lojban] Re: Why we should cancel the vote or all vote NO, John Cowan
      • [lojban] Re: Why we should cancel the vote or all vote NO (was RE: Official Statement- LLG Board approves new baseline policy, Jordan DeLong
      • [lojban] Re: Why we should cancel the vote or all vote NO (was RE: Official Statement- LLG Board approves new baseline policy, Robin Lee Powell
      • [lojban] Re: Why we should cancel the vote or all vote NO (was RE: Official Statement- LLG Board approves new baseline policy, And Rosta
      • [lojban] Re: Why we should cancel the vote or all vote NO (was RE: Official Statement- LLG Board approves new baseline policy, John Cowan
      • [lojban] Re: Why we should cancel the vote or all vote NO (was RE: Official Statement- LLG Board approves new baseline policy, Robert LeChevalier
      • RE: [lojban] Re: Why we should cancel the vote or all vote NO (was RE: Official Statement- LLG Board approves new baseline policy, And Rosta
      • Re: [lojban] Re: Why we should cancel the vote or all vote NO (was RE: Official Statement- LLG Board approves new baseline policRO, John Cowan
      • RE: [lojban] Re: Why we should cancel the vote or all vote NO (was RE: Official Statement- LLG Board approves new baseline policy, Logical Language Group, Inc.
      • RE: [lojban] Re: Why we should cancel the vote or all vote NO (was RE: Official Statement- LLG Board approves new baseline policy, And Rosta
      • RE: [lojban] Re: Why we should cancel the vote or all vote NO (was RE: Official Statement- LLG Board approves new baseline policy, Logical Language Group, Inc.
      • [lojban] Re: Why we should cancel the vote or all vote NO (was RE: Official Statement- LLG Board approves new baseline policy, And Rosta
      • [lojban] Re: Why we should cancel the vote or all vote NO (was RE: Official Statement- LLG Board approves new baseline policy, Jordan DeLong
      • [lojban] Re: Why we should cancel the vote or all vote NO (was RE: Official Statement- LLG Board approves new baseline policy, And Rosta
      • [lojban] Re: Why we should cancel the vote or all vote NO (was RE: Official Statement- LLG Board approves new baseline policy, Robert McIvor
      • [lojban] Re: Why we should cancel the vote or all vote NO (was RE: Official Statement- LLG Board approves new baseline policy, Robert McIvor
      • [lojban] Re: Why we should cancel the vote or all vote NO (was RE: Official Statement- LLG Board approves new baseline policy, Invent Yourself
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [lojban] Re: Why we should cancel the vote or all vote NO (was RE: Official Statement- LLG Board approves new baseline policy, Jorge Llambias
  • RE: [lojban] Re: Why we should cancel the vote or all vote NO (was RE: Official Statement- LLG Board approves new baseline policy, Jorge Llambias
  • [lojban] Re: Why we should cancel the vote or all vote NO (was RE: Official Statement- LLG Board approves new baseline policy, sbelknap
• [lojban] Re: Specific example of Sapir-Whorf in English OR How Lojban made me think more clearly, Adam Raizen
  • [lojban] Re: Specific example of Sapir-Whorf in English OR How Lojban made me think more clearly, Jordan DeLong
    • [lojban] Re: Specific example of Sapir-Whorf in English OR How Lojban made me think more clearly, And Rosta
      • [lojban] Re: Specific example of Sapir-Whorf in English OR How Lojban made me think more clearly, Jordan DeLong
  • [lojban] Re: Specific example of Sapir-Whorf in English OR How Lojbanmade me think more clearly, And Rosta
    • [lojban] Re: Specific example of Sapir-Whorf in English OR How Lojbanmade me think more clearly, Robin Turner
• [lojban] Some concerns from a Lojban beginner, Martin Norbäck
  • [lojban] Re: Some concerns from a Lojban beginner, Craig
  • [lojban] Re: Some concerns from a Lojban beginner, Theodore Reed
  • [lojban] Re: Some concerns from a Lojban beginner, Robert LeChevalier
    • [lojban] Re: Some concerns from a Lojban beginner, Robin Lee Powell
  • [lojban] Re: Some concerns from a Lojban beginner, Robin Lee Powell
    • [lojban] Re: Some concerns from a Lojban beginner, Martin Norbäck
      • [lojban] Re: Some concerns from a Lojban beginner, Robin Lee Powell
• [lojban] A question on the new baseline policy, Craig
  • [lojban] Re: A question on the new baseline policy, Jordan DeLong
    • [lojban] Re: A question on the new baseline policy, Craig
      • [lojban] ka'enai (was: Re: A question on the new baseline policy), Invent Yourself
      • [lojban] Re: ka'enai (was: Re: A question on the new baseline policy), Jordan DeLong
      • [lojban] Re: ka'enai (was: Re: A question on the new baseline policy), Craig
      • [lojban] Re: ka'enai (was: Re: A question on the new baseline policy), Jordan DeLong
      • [lojban] Re: ka'enai (was: Re: A question on the new baseline policy), Jordan DeLong
      • [lojban] Re: ka'enai (was: Re: A question on the new baseline policy), And Rosta
      • [lojban] Re: ka'enai (was: Re: A question on the new baseline policy), Invent Yourself
      • [lojban] Re: ka'enai (was: Re: A question on the new baseline policy), Jordan DeLong
      • [lojban] Re: ka'enai (was: Re: A question on the new baseline policy), And Rosta
      • [lojban] Re: ka'enai (was: Re: A question on the new baseline policy), Jordan DeLong
      • [lojban] Re: ka'enai (was: Re: A question on the new baseline policy), And Rosta
      • [lojban] Re: ka'enai (was: Re: A question on the new baseline policy), Craig
      • [lojban] Re: ka'enai (was: Re: A question on the new baseline policy), Robert LeChevalier
      • RE: [lojban] Re: ka'enai (was: Re: A question on the new baseline policy), And Rosta
      • Re: [lojban] Re: ka'enai (was: Re: A question on the new baseline policy), Robert LeChevalier
      • RE: [lojban] Re: ka'enai (was: Re: A question on the new baseline policy), And Rosta
      • [lojban] Re: ka'enai (was: Re: A question on the new baseline policy), Theodore Reed
• [lojban] Re: Loglan, Nick Nicholas
  • [lojban] Re: Loglan, Robert McIvor
    • [lojban] Re: Loglan, And Rosta
      • Re: [lojban] Re: Loglan, Robert LeChevalier
      • Re: [lojban] Re: Loglan, John Cowan
      • [lojban] Re: Loglan, Robert McIvor
      • [lojban] Re: Loglan, And Rosta
      • [lojban] Re: Loglan, John Cowan
      • [lojban] Re: Loglan, Robert McIvor
      • [lojban] Re: Loglan, Robert LeChevalier
    • [lojban] Re: Loglan, John Cowan
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [lojban] Re: Loglan, Jorge Llambias
    • [lojban] Re: Loglan, Robin Lee Powell
    • RE: [lojban] Re: Loglan, And Rosta
      • [lojban] Re: Loglan, Martin Norbäck
  • [lojban] Re: Loglan, sbelknap
    • [lojban] Re: Loglan, Robert LeChevalier
      • [lojban] Re: Loglan, Robert McIvor
      • [lojban] Re: Loglan Correction, Robert McIvor
  • [lojban] Re: Loglan, sbelknap
    • [lojban] Re: Loglan, John Cowan
  • [lojban] Re: Loglan, sbelknap
  • [lojban] Re: Loglan, sbelknap
  • [lojban] Re: Loglan, And Rosta
  • [lojban] Re: Loglan, And Rosta