[lojban] Re: Why we should cancel the vote or all vote NO

[John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>]

Robert LeChevalier scripsit:

> I deny that the (existing) baseline encompasses semantics because the 
> semantics has not been defined.  

The semantics is *partly* defined, Bob.  You conceded this years ago
when I pointed out that the difference between "mi" and "do" (or
"pa" and "re") is well defined, and is a matter of semantics, since they
have identical syntax.

Since there is no hope of *completely* defining the semantics, the most
we can hope for is to increase the size of the partial definition.

-- 
If you have ever wondered if you are in hell,         John Cowan
it has been said, then you are on a well-traveled     http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
road of spiritual inquiry.  If you are absolutely   http://www.reutershealth.com
sure you are in hell, however, then you must be         jcowan@reutershealth.com
on the Cross Bronx Expressway.          --Alan Feur, NYTimes, 2002-09-20

To unsubscribe, send mail to lojban-unsubscribe@onelist.com 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/