[lojban] Re: LLG = who? (was: RE: Re: Why we should cancel the vote or all vote NO (was RE: Official Statement- LLG Board approves new baseline policy

• To: lojban-list@lojban.org
• Subject: [lojban] Re: LLG = who? (was: RE: Re: Why we should cancel the vote or all vote NO (was RE: Official Statement- LLG Board approves new baseline policy
• From: Jordan DeLong <lojban-out@lojban.org>
• Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2002 21:50:46 -0600
• In-reply-to: <LPBBJKMNINKHACNDIIGMEEENHAAA.a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
• References: <20021202210937.GJ1520@digitalkingdom.org> <LPBBJKMNINKHACNDIIGMEEENHAAA.a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
• Reply-to: fracture@allusion.net
• Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
• User-agent: Mutt/1.5.1i

• References:
  • [lojban] Re: Why we should cancel the vote or all vote NO (was RE: Official Statement- LLG Board approves new baseline policy
    • From: Robin Lee Powell <lojban-out@lojban.org>
  • [lojban] LLG = who? (was: RE: Re: Why we should cancel the vote or all vote NO (was RE: Official Statement- LLG Board approves new baseline policy
    • From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>

• Prev by Date: [lojban] constitutional amendability (was: RE: Re: Official Statement- LLG Board approves newbaseline policy
• Next by Date: [lojban] Re: constitutional amendability (was: RE: Re: Official Statement- LLG Board approves newbaseline policy
• Previous by thread: [lojban] LLG = who? (was: RE: Re: Why we should cancel the vote or all vote NO (was RE: Official Statement- LLG Board approves new baseline policy
• Next by thread: [lojban] Re: LLG = who? (was: RE: Re: Why we should cancel the vote or all vote NO (was RE: Official Statement- LLG Board approves new baseline policy
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread