Mail Index

• Thread Index

• Re: [lojban] Loglan
  • From: Nick Nicholas <opoudjis@optushome.com.au>
• [lojban] Re: ka'enai (was: Re: A question on the new baseline policy)
  • From: Adam Raizen <lojban-out@lojban.org>
• [lojban] Re: Official Statement- LLG Board approves newbaseline policy
  • From: Adam Raizen <lojban-out@lojban.org>
• [lojban] Re: Specific example of Sapir-Whorf in English OR How Lojban made me think more clearly
  • From: Adam Raizen <lojban-out@lojban.org>
• [lojban] Re: Some concerns from a Lojban beginner
  • From: Robin Lee Powell <lojban-out@lojban.org>
• [lojban] Re: Some concerns from a Lojban beginner
  • From: Robin Lee Powell <lojban-out@lojban.org>
• [lojban] Re: Loglan
  • From: Robin Lee Powell <lojban-out@lojban.org>
• [lojban] Re: Official Statement- LLG Board approves newbaseline policy
  • From: Robin Lee Powell <lojban-out@lojban.org>
• Re: [lojban] Re: The "Vote for Nick" platform
  • From: Robert LeChevalier <lojbab@lojban.org>
• [lojban] Re: Specific example of Sapir-Whorf in English OR How Lojban made me think more clearly
  • From: Jordan DeLong <fracture@allusion.net>
• [lojban] Re: The "Vote for Nick" platform
  • From: Jordan DeLong <fracture@allusion.net>
• [lojban] Re: Specific example of Sapir-Whorf in English OR How Lojban made me think more clearly
  • From: Pierre Abbat <phma@webjockey.net>
• [lojban] Re: Translation: "The Man and the Snake", by Ambrose Bierce
  • From: Jordan DeLong <lojban-out@lojban.org>
• RE: [lojban] mu'ei ?
  • From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
• RE: [lojban] Re: Loglan
  • From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
• RE: [lojban] Re: ka'enai (was: Re: A question on the new baseline policy)
  • From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
• [lojban] Re: ka'enai (was: Re: A question on the new baseline policy)
  • From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
• Re: [lojban] Re: Why we should cancel the vote or all vote NO (was RE: Official Statement- LLG Board approves new baseline policy
  • From: "Logical Language Group, Inc." <lojban@lojban.org>
• [lojban] Re: Why we should cancel the vote or all vote NO (was RE: Official Statement- LLG Board approves new baseline policy
  • From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
• [lojban] Re: ka'enai (was: Re: A question on the new baseline policy)
  • From: Jordan DeLong <fracture@allusion.net>
• [lojban] Re: Why we should cancel the vote or all vote NO (was RE: Official Statement- LLG Board approves new baseline policy
  • From: Robin Lee Powell <lojban-out@lojban.org>
• RE: [lojban] Re: Loglan
  • From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
• [lojban] Re: Why we should cancel the vote or all vote NO (was RE: Official Statement- LLG Board approves new baseline policy
  • From: Jordan DeLong <lojban-out@lojban.org>
• [lojban] Re: Why we should cancel the vote or all vote NO (was RE: Official Statement- LLG Board approves new baseline policy
  • From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
• [lojban] Re: Why we should cancel the vote or all vote NO (was RE: Official Statement- LLG Board approves new baseline policy
  • From: Robin Lee Powell <lojban-out@lojban.org>
• [lojban] Re: Why we should cancel the vote or all vote NO (was RE: Official Statement- LLG Board approves new baseline policy
  • From: Robin Lee Powell <lojban-out@lojban.org>
• RE: [lojban] Re: Why we should cancel the vote or all vote NO (was RE: Official Statement- LLG Board approves new baseline policy
  • From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
• [lojban] Re: Specific example of Sapir-Whorf in English OR How Lojban made me think more clearly
  • From: Jim Carter <jimc@MATH.UCLA.EDU>
• [lojban] Re: Why we should cancel the vote or all vote NO (was RE: Official Statement- LLG Board approves new baseline policy
  • From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
• [lojban] Re: Specific example of Sapir-Whorf in English OR How Lojban made me think more clearly
  • From: Invent Yourself <xod@thestonecutters.net>
• [lojban] nature of debate (was: RE: Re: Why we should cancel the vote or all vote NO (was RE: Official Statement- LLG Board approves new baseline policy
  • From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
• [lojban] Re: ka'enai (was: Re: A question on the new baseline policy)
  • From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
• [lojban] factionalization (was: RE: Re: Why we should cancel the vote or all vote NO (was RE: Official Statement- LLG Board approves new baseline policy
  • From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
• [lojban] Re: factionalization (was: RE: Re: Why we should cancel the vote or all vote NO (was RE: Official Statement- LLG Board approves new baseline policy
  • From: Robin Lee Powell <lojban-out@lojban.org>
• [lojban] LLG = who? (was: RE: Re: Why we should cancel the vote or all vote NO (was RE: Official Statement- LLG Board approves new baseline policy
  • From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
• [lojban] Re: ka'enai (was: Re: A question on the new baseline policy)
  • From: "Craig" <raganok@intrex.net>
• [lojban] constitutional amendability (was: RE: Re: Official Statement- LLG Board approves newbaseline policy
  • From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
• [lojban] Re: LLG = who? (was: RE: Re: Why we should cancel the vote or all vote NO (was RE: Official Statement- LLG Board approves new baseline policy
  • From: Jordan DeLong <lojban-out@lojban.org>
• [lojban] Re: constitutional amendability (was: RE: Re: Official Statement- LLG Board approves newbaseline policy
  • From: Jordan DeLong <fracture@allusion.net>
• [lojban] Re: LLG = who? (was: RE: Re: Why we should cancel the vote or all vote NO (was RE: Official Statement- LLG Board approves new baseline policy
  • From: Robin Lee Powell <lojban-out@lojban.org>
• [lojban] Re: constitutional amendability (was: RE: Re: Official Statement- LLG Board approves newbaseline policy
  • From: Robin Lee Powell <lojban-out@lojban.org>
• RE: [lojban] Re: Why we should cancel the vote or all vote NO (was RE: Official Statement- LLG Board approves new baseline policy
  • From: "Logical Language Group, Inc." <lojban@lojban.org>
• [lojban] ua me'o tarci bu pesecau lo liste
  • From: Pierre Abbat <phma@webjockey.net>
• Re: [lojban] Re: Why we should cancel the vote or all vote NO
  • From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
• [lojban] Re: constitutional amendability (was: RE: Re: Official Statement- LLG Board approves newbaseline policy
  • From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
• [lojban] Re: Why we should cancel the vote or all vote NO (was RE: Official Statement- LLG Board approves new baseline policy
  • From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
• [lojban] Re: Why we should cancel the vote or all vote NO (was RE: Official Statement- LLG Board approves new baseline policy
  • From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
• [lojban] Re: Why we should cancel the vote or all vote NO (was RE: Official Statement- LLG Board approves new baseline policy
  • From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
• [lojban] Re: nature of debate (was: RE: Re: Why we should cancel the vote or all vote NO (was RE: Official Statement- LLG Board appr
  • From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
• RE: [lojban] Re: Why we should cancel the vote or all vote NO (was RE: Official Statement- LLG Board approves new baseline policy
  • From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
• [lojban] Re: Why we should cancel the vote or all vote NO (was RE: Official Statement- LLG Board approves new baseline policy
  • From: Robin Lee Powell <lojban-out@lojban.org>
• [lojban] Re: nature of debate (was: RE: Re: Why we should cancel the vote or all vote NO (was RE: Official Statement- LLG Board appr
  • From: Robin Lee Powell <lojban-out@lojban.org>
• [lojban] Re: ka'enai (was: Re: A question on the new baseline policy)
  • From: Robert LeChevalier <lojbab@lojban.org>
• Re: [lojban] Re: Why we should cancel the vote or all vote NO (was RE: Official Statement- LLG Board approves new baseline policy
  • From: "Logical Language Group, Inc." <lojban@lojban.org>
• [lojban] Re: LLG = who? (was: RE: Re: Why we should cancel the vote or all vote NO (was RE: Official Statement- LLG Board approves new baseline policy
  • From: "Logical Language Group, Inc." <lojban@lojban.org>
• [lojban] Re: constitutional amendability (was: RE: Re: Official Statement- LLG Board approves newbaseline policy
  • From: "Logical Language Group, Inc." <lojban@lojban.org>
• [lojban] Another General Statement Of Support
  • From: "poldenet" <lojban-out@lojban.org>
• [lojban] Re: Why we should cancel the vote or all vote NO
  • From: "Lionel Vidal" <nessus@free.fr>
• RE: [lojban] Re: Why we should cancel the vote or all vote NO (was RE: Official Statement- LLG Board approves new baseline policy
  • From: "Logical Language Group, Inc." <lojban@lojban.org>
• [lojban] Re: Some concerns from a Lojban beginner
  • From: Martin Norbäck <d95mback@dtek.chalmers.se>
• [lojban] Re: Why we should cancel the vote or all vote NO (was RE: Official Statement- LLG Board approves new baseline policy
  • From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
• RE: [lojban] Re: ka'enai (was: Re: A question on the new baseline policy)
  • From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
• [lojban] Re: Why we should cancel the vote or all vote NO (was RE: Official Statement- LLG Board approves new baseline policy
  • From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
• [lojban] little-endian vs. big-endian (was:Specific example of Sapir-Whorf in English OR How Lojban made me think more clearly)
  • From: Adam Raizen <araizen@newmail.net>
• [lojban] Re: Loglan
  • From: Martin Norbäck <lojban-out@lojban.org>
• [lojban] Re: Why we should cancel the vote or all vote NO (was RE: Official Statement- LLG Board approves new baseline policy
  • From: Jordan DeLong <lojban-out@lojban.org>
• [lojban] Arabic, Hindi, Urdu, Simp.Chinese required
  • From: Nick Nicholas <opoudjis@optushome.com.au>
• Re: [lojban] Re: Loglan
  • From: Steven Belknap <sbelknap@UIC.EDU>
• [lojban] Re: Why we should cancel the vote or all vote NO (was RE: Official Statement- LLG Board approves new baseline policy
  • From: Robin Lee Powell <lojban-out@lojban.org>
• [lojban] ".i la lojban(.) mo"
  • From: And Rosta <arosta@uclan.ac.uk>
• [lojban] Re: Some concerns from a Lojban beginner
  • From: Robin Lee Powell <lojban-out@lojban.org>
• RE: [lojban] Re: Why we should cancel the vote or all vote NO (was RE: Official Statement- LLG Board approves new baseline policy
  • From: "Jorge Llambias" <jjllambias@hotmail.com>
• [lojban] Re: ".i la lojban(.) mo"
  • From: Theodore Reed <rizen@surreality.us>
• [lojban] Re: Another General Statement Of Support
  • From: Theodore Reed <rizen@surreality.us>
• [lojban] Re: little-endian vs. big-endian (was:Specific example of Sapir-Whorf in English OR How Lojban made me think more clearly)
  • From: Robin Turner <robin@bilkent.edu.tr>
• [lojban] Re: ".i la lojban(.) mo"
  • From: Robin Turner <robin@bilkent.edu.tr>
• Re: [lojban] Re: ".i la lojban(.) mo"
  • From: "Jorge Llambias" <jjllambias@hotmail.com>
• [lojban] Minor website updates.
  • From: Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>
• [lojban] Re: ".i la lojban(.) mo"
  • From: Pierre Abbat <phma@webjockey.net>
• [lojban] Re: Why we should cancel the vote or all vote NO (was RE: Official Statement- LLG Board approves new baseline policy
  • From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
• [lojban] s/is/are/
  • From: BestATN@aol.com
• [lojban] Re: ".i la lojban(.) mo"
  • From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
• [lojban] Re: Arabic, Hindi, Urdu, Simp.Chinese required
  • From: Robin Turner <lojban-out@lojban.org>
• [lojban] Re: ".i la lojban(.) mo"
  • From: Jordan DeLong <lojban-out@lojban.org>
• [lojban] Re: ka'enai (was: Re: A question on the new baseline policy)
  • From: "Jorge Llambias" <jjllambias@hotmail.com>
• [lojban] Re: ka'enai (was: Re: A question on the new baseline policy)
  • From: Jordan DeLong <fracture@allusion.net>
• [lojban] mex (was: Why we should cancel the vote or all vote NO)
  • From: Adam Raizen <lojban-out@lojban.org>
• [lojban] Backlog: Brochure
  • From: Nick Nicholas <opoudjis@optushome.com.au>
• [lojban] Re: ka'enai (was: Re: A question on the new baseline policy)
  • From: Robert LeChevalier <lojbab@lojban.org>
• [lojban] Re: ka'enai (was: Re: A question on the new baseline policy)
  • From: Pierre Abbat <phma@webjockey.net>
• [lojban] Re: ka'enai (was: Re: A question on the new baseline policy)
  • From: "Jorge Llambias" <jjllambias@hotmail.com>
• [lojban] Re: ka'enai (was: Re: A question on the new baseline policy)
  • From: "Jorge Llambias" <jjllambias@hotmail.com>
• [lojban] Baseline statement
  • From: Nick Nicholas <opoudjis@optushome.com.au>
• response to And
  • From: Nick Nicholas <opoudjis@optushome.com.au>
• And, continued
  • From: Nick Nicholas <opoudjis@optushome.com.au>
• Re: [lojban] Baseline statement
  • From: And Rosta <arosta@uclan.ac.uk>
• [lojban] Re: Baseline statement
  • From: Jordan DeLong <fracture@allusion.net>
• [lojban] Re: Official Statement- LLG Board approves new baseline policy
  • From: Steven Belknap <sbelknap@UIC.EDU>
• Re: [lojban] Baseline statement
  • From: "Jorge Llambias" <jjllambias@hotmail.com>
• Re: [lojban] response to And
  • From: And Rosta <arosta@uclan.ac.uk>