[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[lojban] Re: little-endian vs. big-endian (was:Specific example of Sapir-Whorf in English OR How Lojban made me think more clearly)



Adam Raizen wrote:
la djorden. cusku di'e

I use big-endian in english, but lojban's specified (I think?  I
only remember this from nick/robin's lessons; dunno what, if anything,
the book says) to use little endian.

It's probably not a problem to go ahead using big-endian, though,
since the two are unambig because the year is 4 digits.


I don't think that the book says anything about it, though I'm not completely certain, but at any rate, this is clearly an extra-linguistic issue. In the US they use middle-endian dates, whereas in Britain they use little-endian dates, and no one claims that Americans and Britons speak different languages because of that. It's a bit like metric vs. English Imperial.

Little-endian vs. big-endian is more like normal equation order vs. reverse Polish, or SVO vs. VSO - it's a matter of what you're comfortable with. Middle-endian is like imperial measurements; i.e. totally ludicrous.

robin.tr


--
"Do unto others what you would like others to do unto you. And have fun doing it."
- Linus Torvalds

Robin Turner
IDMYO,
Bilkent University
Ankara 06533
Turkey

www.bilkent.edu.tr/~robin