[lojban] Re: ka'enai (was: Re: A question on the new baseline policy)

[Pierre Abbat <phma@webjockey.net>]

On Wednesday 04 December 2002 02:01, Jordan DeLong wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 07:42:28PM +0000, Jorge Llambias wrote:
> > >pa re nai ci?
> > >(pa re .uinai ci passes the parser)
> >
> > That could be used in this context, for example:
> >
> > A: pa re xu ci
> > B: i pa re nai ci i pa ze ja'ai ci
>
> I dunno what ja'ai is and don't feel like looking it up.  This seems
> highly contrived though.  Anyway, there's certainly tons of weird
> things which would need to be explained (ku nai, pi'e nai, la/le/etc nai,
> .inai, mi nai, la'e nai di'u, jai nai, etc etc).

This calls for {na'i}, not {nai}.

phma