[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[lojban] Re: Loglan
On Lundi, déce 2, 2002, at 00:33 US/Eastern, Nick Nicholas wrote:
But for goodness' sake, someone bell the cat and ask McIvor or
whoever whether we can legally do this. Then, someone find a
bilingual and do this. And let life move on. I think this approach
much healthier than the toggle, actually: the toggle presupposes
codeswitching, which presupposes bilingualism, and you've said
yourself that ain't gonna happen.
I have already said that I have no objection.
McIvor is not on the BPFK, is he? Why not invite him?
Bob expressly wants to invite him. I didn't, and if he is invited,
as far as I'm concerned, he's invited as a Lojbanist (or at the
least, as someone with expertise in Logical Language), not as a
Loglanist.
I received an informal invitation to participate, but having read
all the correspondence to this point, I see no point in doing so.
And invite? We haven't gotten that far yet. The current board
statement says the BPFK is open to all comers. (I would prefer it not
be, because it also has to be manageable, but we'll cross that bridge
when we do.) So he's not disinvitable as the statement stands,
really. I do believe I've got the authority to boot people --- and to
be booted; I really don't want it to come to either point...