Robert LeChevalier scripsit:
> fu'ivla, especially Type IVs, however, are irregular, and thus there are
> few aural patterns that distinguish them. I haven't heard spoken Lojban
> with a lot of fu'ivla in them, but I suspect that with fluent speech they
> will be the hardest to identify.
I would actually like to see the byfy nail down the definition of Type 4s,
saying "They take these forms and no others" rather than the current
negative definition: "They take whatever forms are left after gismu/
cmavo compounds/lujvo/Type 3s/rafsi fu'ivla have been removed."