At 01:48 PM 1/17/03 -0500, Pierre Abbat wrote:
On Friday 17 January 2003 08:46, Newton, Philip wrote:
> So I'm not sure that the example is that good. (I don't have a better one,
> however. {pitsa} would be even worse since it's a valid gismu form. Not
> sure whether there are any other good "quintessential examples", as the FAQ
> calls it, of fu'ivla.)
I'm not sure what "quintessential example" means, but there are lots of
fu'ivla, and a couple of lujvo made of fu'ivla, in the taxonomy chart
(http://www.lojban.org/wiki/index.php/Taxonomy).
There are no officially approved Type IV fu'ivla, and I think Nick is planning not to approve any for the dictionary - only type IIIs.
-- lojbab lojbab@lojban.org Bob LeChevalier, President, The Logical Language Group, Inc. 2904 Beau Lane, Fairfax VA 22031-1303 USA 703-385-0273 Artificial language Loglan/Lojban: http://www.lojban.org